Potential that has had me stuck for hours

  • Thread starter Thread starter Destrio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Stuck
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in electrostatics involving the potential at the center of a nonconducting, flat, circular annulus with a given charge density. The charge density is defined as o = k/r^3, where r is the distance from the center of the annulus. Participants are tasked with deriving the potential at the center, given that V = 0 at infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss how to determine the constant k in the charge density equation by integrating the charge density over the annulus and equating it to the total charge Q. There are attempts to express k in terms of Q, a, and b, with various integrations being explored.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the variables involved, with some participants questioning their calculations and others providing corrections. Multiple interpretations of the integration process and the implications of the charge density are being examined, indicating a productive exchange of ideas without a clear consensus yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through potential confusion regarding the integration of charge density and the implications of negative signs in their calculations. There is also a focus on ensuring that the derived expressions align with the initial conditions of the problem.

Destrio
Messages
211
Reaction score
0
A total amount of positive charge Q is spread onto a nonconducting, flat, circular annulus of inner radius a and outer radius b. The charge is distributed so that the charge density (charge per unit area) is giver by o = k/r^3, where r is the distance from the centre of the annulus to any point on it. Show that (with V = 0 at infinity) the potential at the centre of the annulus is given by:

V = (Q/8pie)((a+b)/ab)

so I have

dV = (1/4pie)(dQ/r)

dQ = odA = o2pirdr = 2piQdr/r^2

I'm really confused about the k in o = k/r^3
I'm thinking it must either be the constant k = 1/4pie, but my professor never rights that as k, so I'm thinking that k=Q because otherwise I don't see a way to have Q in the expression.

So I tried taking the integral of that expression from a to b with plugging dA and o in, but I'm not getting what I need.

Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To find k: You are given the total charge (Q) and the charge density. Integrate the charge density over the annulus to get an expression for the total charge. Equate this with Q and solve for k.


Destrio said:
A total amount of positive charge Q is spread onto a nonconducting, flat, circular annulus of inner radius a and outer radius b. The charge is distributed so that the charge density (charge per unit area) is giver by o = k/r^3, where r is the distance from the centre of the annulus to any point on it. Show that (with V = 0 at infinity) the potential at the centre of the annulus is given by:

V = (Q/8pie)((a+b)/ab)

so I have

dV = (1/4pie)(dQ/r)

dQ = odA = o2pirdr = 2piQdr/r^2

I'm really confused about the k in o = k/r^3
I'm thinking it must either be the constant k = 1/4pie, but my professor never rights that as k, so I'm thinking that k=Q because otherwise I don't see a way to have Q in the expression.

So I tried taking the integral of that expression from a to b with plugging dA and o in, but I'm not getting what I need.

Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks
 
so if i integrate the charge density from a to b i get -2k/r^2
Q = -2k/r^2
k = -qr^2/2

is this correct? how will i get rid of this negative?
 
or do i do:
odA = dQ
Q = -4pik((1/b)-(1/a))
Q = 4pik((b-a)/ab)
k = Qab/4pi(b-a)
 
Your second post is good, except you should check your work. Bringing the negative into the parentheses should change b-a to a-b, and from where did you get the 4?
 
i used the - to make it 1/a - 1/b
then changed it to b-a/ab so i was back at b-a

the 4 i got from dA = 2pirdr
then *-2 from the integral
i used o=k/r^3 and odA = Q
should i just use o=k/r^3 to get
Q = -2k(1/b - 1/a)
k = (Q/2)(ab/b-a)

once i get k, what do i do with it?
 
thats not right, without the dA i end up with
Q = -2k(1/b^2 - 1/a^2)
 
Sorry, that was my mistake. Your b-a is correct, but your k still isn't completely right. You are missing a \pi in there.

After you find k, you should then integrate to find the total potential. Remember, that

V = \int \frac{k \cdot dq}{r}

EDIT:

How are you finding Q? It should be the case that

Q = \int dq = \int_a^b 2\pi r \sigma \cdot dr
 
Last edited:
i figure i must be integrating dQ = odA from a to b
dq = int k/r^3 dA
but i know dA = 2pirdr
is that correct?
i don't know how to integrate that
 
  • #10
Yes, that is correct, What you basically have is

dq = \sigma dA = \frac{2\pi k \cdot dr}{r^2}

then

Q = \int_a^b \frac{2\pi k \cdot dr}{r^2}

which you can do, because it is just using the power rule (take out the constants first). You almost had it right the first time.
 
  • #11
or will it be Q = 2pik * int dr/r^2
 
  • #12
that was what i did back when i got: k = Qab/4pi(b-a)
 
  • #13
Yes, you are right, but try integrating

\int \frac{dr}{r^2}

again. If you do it correctly, then solve for k, you should have a 2, not a 4.
 
  • #14
ah yes, terrible mistake... brought over a -2 instead of a -1

so when i intergrate the final part

dV = kdQ/r
do i want to have dQ = odA
integrating that will give me what i got for Q again
and what do i do with the r?
 
  • #15
Not quite, because you this time you are integrating dQ/(4\pi\epsilon r), not just dQ, as you did when finding what k equals in terms of Q. Furthermore, you can replace the k in \sigma with whatever you found k to be in terms of Q, a, and b.
 
  • #16
i can take out the 4pie as a constant so I am left with integrating dQ/r which I am not sure how to integrate..
do I want to change dQ to odA then everything is in terms of r

dV = odA/r4pie
= k2pirdr/(r^4)(4pie)

V = int dV = (Q/4pie)(ab/b-a) * int dr/r^3
= (Q/4pie)(ab/b-a)(-2)(1/b^2 -1/a^2)

is this correct so far?
 
  • #17
this leaves me with the correct answer, except with 2pie on the bottom instead of 8pie (I had a factor of 2 in the numerator instead of denominator)
 
  • #18
You're right, but you need a -1/2 instead of a -2 coming out of the integral.
 
  • #19
ah yes, i need to brush up on those integrals, thanks!
i wouldn't have been able to solve this on my own
 
  • #20
wait, why would i get -1/2 from integrating 1/r^3
shouldnt it be -2?
 
  • #21
Well, think about taking the derivative. If you have a -1/2 in front, taking the derivative of 1/r^2 would give you a -2 in front, which would cancel the -1/2, leaving you with 1/r^3, which is what you have as the integrand.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
868
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K