Archived Power factor at half power points for RLC circuit

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the power factor of a series RLC circuit when the dissipated power drops by a factor of two as the frequency changes from resonant to non-resonant. The user initially calculated the power factor as 0.5, but the book states it should be √2/2. The correct approach involves recognizing that at resonance, the power factor is 1, and when the power is halved, the impedance results in a phase angle of 45 degrees, leading to the power factor being √2/2. The calculations confirm that the reactance equals the resistance at the non-resonant frequency, validating the book's answer. Understanding the use of complex power and the significance of the complex conjugate in these calculations is crucial for accurate results.
Loki
Can anyone help me with this homework problem? I worked it through, but the answer i get doesn't agree with the answer the book gives. I'll include my work, and if anyone can help, I'll be eternally grateful, at least for a while.

The Problem:

In a series RCL circuit the dissapated power drops by a factor of two when the frequency of the generator is changed from the resonant frequency to a nonresonant frequency. The peak voltage is held constant while this change is made. Determine the power factor of the curcuit at nonresonant frequency.​

My Work:

P_r = 2 P_{nr}
P = I * V * \cos \phi
\phi = \arctan \frac{X_L - X_C}{R}
At resonant frequency, X_L - X_C = 0
I * V * \cos ( \arctan \frac{X_L-X_C}{R} ) = 2 * I * V \cos (\arctan\frac{X_L-X_C}{R})
I * V * \cos ( \arctan (0)) = 2 * I * V \cos (\arctan\frac{X_L-X_C}{R})
I * V * \cos (0) = 2 * I * V \cos (\phi)
1 = 2 \cos (\phi)
\cos \phi = \frac{1}{2}

This seems correct to me, but the book says the answer is \frac{\sqrt {2}}{2}

Am I mistaking the "Factor of two" part of the problem? Does this really mean that the power is squared?


If anybody can help, thanks. On a sidenote, LaTeX is very nice, if a bit tedious to write in.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A complete solution is offered.

At resonance the current is in phase with the voltage source, and the power factor is 1. In that case the power dissipated is simply

##P_o = \frac{V^2}{R}~~~##where ##R## is the circuit resistance and ##V## the fixed voltage.

We are looking for the power factor for the situation where the dissipated power drops by a factor of two. That is,

## P = \frac{P_o}{2} = \frac{V^2}{2R}##

Off-resonance there will be a net reactance, X. We won't worry about the individual reactances of the inductance and capacitance, only their net effect. Let:

##Z = R + j X## be the impedance at the off-resonance frequency.

Then the complex power (apparent power) for the circuit is given by:

##p = V~I^* = V ⋅ \frac{V}{(R + jX)^*} = V^2 \frac{R + jX}{R^2 +X^2}##

where ##I^*## means the complex conjugate of ##I##.

Now, the real power dissipated is the real component of the complex power. Setting this equal to our desired value:

##\frac{V^2}{2R} = V^2 \frac{R}{R^2 +X^2}##

Solving for the reactance we find that ##X = R##. This means that the impedance has a value ##Z = R (1 + j)##, which has a phase angle of 45°. The current, which is V/Z will have an angle of -45°. The cosine of -45° is ##\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##, so that is the power factor.

Note that the reactance could be positive or negative (net inductive or net capacitive reactance), and that the power factor will be the same since ##~~~cos(-45°) = cos(45°) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and cnh1995
Here's my two cents..
At resonance,
Pr=VIr..(cosΦ=1)
At non-resonant frequency,
Pnr=VInrcosΦ
But Pr=2Pnr
So,
VIr=2VInrcosΦ
∴Ir=2InrcosΦ
∴V/R=2*(V/Z)cosΦ
...(R remains same in both the cases)
∴Z/R=2cosΦ
Since R/Z is cos Φ, we can directly write,
2cos2Φ=1
∴cosΦ=1/√2=0.7071
(=√2/2 as given in the answer)
 
  • Like
Likes gracy and gneill
Nice. That works. It's great to see variations!
 
  • Like
Likes cnh1995
gneill said:
A complete solution is offered.

At resonance the current is in phase with the voltage source, and the power factor is 1. In that case the power dissipated is simply

##P_o = \frac{V^2}{R}~~~##where ##R## is the circuit resistance and ##V## the fixed voltage.

We are looking for the power factor for the situation where the dissipated power drops by a factor of two. That is,

## P = \frac{P_o}{2} = \frac{V^2}{2R}##

Off-resonance there will be a net reactance, X. We won't worry about the individual reactances of the inductance and capacitance, only their net effect. Let:

##Z = R + j X## be the impedance at the off-resonance frequency.

Then the complex power (apparent power) for the circuit is given by:

##p = V~I^* = V ⋅ \frac{V}{(R + jX)^*} = V^2 \frac{R + jX}{R^2 +X^2}##

where ##I^*## means the complex conjugate of ##I##.

Now, the real power dissipated is the real component of the complex power. Setting this equal to our desired value:

##\frac{V^2}{2R} = V^2 \frac{R}{R^2 +X^2}##

Solving for the reactance we find that ##X = R##. This means that the impedance has a value ##Z = R (1 + j)##, which has a phase angle of 45°. The current, which is V/Z will have an angle of -45°. The cosine of -45° is ##\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##, so that is the power factor.

Note that the reactance could be positive or negative (net inductive or net capacitive reactance), and that the power factor will be the same since ##~~~cos(-45°) = cos(45°) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}##.

Why do you set ##I=\frac{V}{R-JX}## instead of ##\frac{V}{R+JX}## In other words, why use the complex conjugate and not Z as it is?
 
fahraynk said:
Why do you set ##I=\frac{V}{R-JX}## instead of ##\frac{V}{R+JX}## In other words, why use the complex conjugate and not Z as it is?
Because the complex power is given by ##P = V I^*##. See, for example: An Introduction to Electric Circuit Theory by G. Williams, section 5.8. Since the V that we are using here is purely real, the way to form the complex conjugate is to change the sign of the imaginary term in the impedance in the denominator.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top