Power problem, to use net force or work energy theorem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a helicopter that accelerates vertically from rest, and participants are discussing how to calculate the average power generated by the lifting force. The context includes concepts from mechanics, specifically the work-energy theorem and net force analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring two different methods to solve the problem: one using net force and average acceleration, and the other using conservation of energy principles. Questions arise regarding the validity of the methods and the assumptions made about acceleration.

Discussion Status

Some participants suggest that the work-energy approach is more appropriate for this scenario, while others question the assumptions made in the net force method. There is an acknowledgment that both methods should yield the same result, but discrepancies in the calculations indicate potential misunderstandings in applying the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the assumption of constant acceleration may not hold true, which affects the calculations. There is also a mention of the need for clarity on the energy equations used by the original poster and their classmate.

deblimp
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A helicopter, starting from rest, accelerates straight up from the roof of a hospital. The lifting force does work in raising the helicopter. An 720-kg helicopter rises from rest to a speed of 7.5 m/s in a time of 5.0 s. During this time it climbs to a height of 7.9 m. What is the average power generated by the lifting force?

Homework Equations



Gpe=mgh KE=1/2MV^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so we had a test today and afterwards we were discussing how to do one of the problems. Me and a classmate had two different ways to do this problem. He determined the net force acting on the helicopter by calculating the average acceleration and from there using the equation W=Fcos*X. I used conservation of energy to determine that the total energy in the problem using Gpe=mgh KE=1/2MV^2. From there we both divided by time to get the power, not the work. Using these two methods does end up with two relatively different answers, so I was wondering which is the right method to use?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi deblimp. Welcome to PF!

The work-energy approach should give the correct answer.

Why isn't the other method valid? Note that the formula W = F*x*cosθ requires using the force averaged over the distance x. But when you use a = Δv/Δt for the average acceleration, you get the acceleration averaged over time from which you can get the force averaged over time. But the time-average of the force doesn't necessarily equal the distance-average of the force.

For example, suppose you push a block along a frictionless surface a total distance of 2 meters such that during the first meter you push with 10 N of force and the second meter you push with 20 N of force? The distance-average of the force would clearly be 15 N. Would the time-averaged force be greater than, less than, or equal to the distance average?
 
While both methods should give the same result, you are looking for the average power generated by the lifting force. It appears from your wording that your classmate was using the net force to determine the net work done, then dividing the net work done by the time to get the average power. This would be incorrect. I don't know what energy equation you were using either, for that matter. You might want to show your work, and that of your classmate also, if you have it.
 
An 720-kg helicopter rises from rest to a speed of 7.5 m/s in a time of 5.0 s. During this time it climbs to a height of 7.9 m.

He determined the net force acting on the helicopter by calculating the average acceleration

How did he calculate the acceleration?

Method 1 (using the height and velocity data):

V2 = U2 + 2as

a = V2/2s = 7.52/(2 *7.9) = 3.5ms-2

Method 2 (using the height and time data):

s = ut + 0.5at2
a = 2s/t2 = (2 * 7.9)/52 = 0.53ms-2

Different answers suggests the acceleration wasn't constant and that's a requirement for using these equations. He made a wrong assumption I believe.

Your approach using energy is correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K