Power required for helicopter to hover.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fruh2theline
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Helicopter Power
AI Thread Summary
To determine the power required for a smaller helicopter to hover, it is modeled as a sphere, with its volume and mass decreasing by an eighth when its dimensions are halved. The lift generated by the rotor blades is proportional to the area they sweep, which decreases by a quarter due to the reduced rotor length. Consequently, while the weight decreases by an eighth, the lift reduction means that the smaller helicopter requires only half the power of the original to hover. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding scaling in physics, particularly how power relates to mass and lift. Overall, the conclusion is that the smaller helicopter needs one-eighth of the power of the larger helicopter to achieve hover.
Fruh2theline
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A helicopter can hover when the output of its engines is P. A second helicopter, an exact copy of the first one, but its linear dimensions are half of those of the original. What power output is needed to enable this second helicopter to fly?


Homework Equations



The teacher describes this problem as being "maximum physics and minimum maths" so I am modeling the helicopter as a sphere for simplicity and working from there.


The Attempt at a Solution



If the helicopter is a sphere then decreasing the radius of the sphere by a half will decrease the volume by an eighth (V is proportional to radius cubed).
If the volume is decreased by an eighth then the mass is decreased by an eighth.

The lift of the blades if proportional to area of the circle they sweep out so decreasing their length by a half will decrease the area of the circle by a quarter (area is proportional to r squared).

So if the weight is decreased by an eighth and the lift from the blades is decreased by a quarter then half of the power of the original helicopter will suffice for this one to hover.

Am I missing anything?
Is this solution plausible?
Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Honestly I think you went further.
The power needed is just one eight of the bigger helicopter.
 
It is all about scaling. Power scales with mass (you better try to prove it).

Rotor diameter doesn't matter, as amount of air moved depend not only on rotor diameter, but also on the rotation speed - and it doesn't have to be constant.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top