Precession of relativistic orbit in pure inverse-square force

RylonMcknz
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
PROBLEM:
Show that Special Relativity predicts a precession of π(GMm/cl)2 radians per orbit for any elliptic orbit under a pure inverse-square force.

where G is gravitational constant, M is mass of larger body, m is mass of smaller orbiting body, c is speed of light and l is angular momentum.​

HINTS:
Differential equation for Newtonian inverse-square force orbit: d2u/dθ2 + u = mk/l2 (Eq.1), where u = 1/r, k = GMm.

To make this relativistic: mk→ϒmk, where ϒ = 1/√(1 - (v2/c2)).

Also E = ϒmc2 + U.

Then right side of (Eq. 1) becomes ⇒ϒmk/l2 = (E - U)k/c2l2 = (E + ku)k/c2l2 (Eq. 2).

Precession causes the following change of phase angle (in radians/orbit):

Δθ - Δθ' = 2π/ω - 2π = 2π(1/ω - 1) (Eq. 3).​

ATTEMPT:
(Eq. 1) & (Eq. 2) d2u/dθ2 + u = (E + ku)k/c2l2

d2u/dθ2 + u - k2u/c2l2 =
Ek/c2l2

⇒ d2u/dθ2 + (1 - k2/c2l2)u = Ek/c2l2
,

where ω2 = (1 - k2/c2l2) (Eq. 4),
and let A = Ek/c2l2.

Then substitute y = u - A/ω2.

Then we have d2y/dθ2 + ω2[y + A/ω2] - A = 0

d2y/dθ2 + ω2y = 0

Solution is then y = y0cos(ωθ - θ0).

I then try substituting (Eq. 4) into (Eq. 3) to find the resulting precession in radians per orbit, but this doesn't not give the desired result. This is where I'm stuck, not sure what I'm doing wrong. Thank you for your considerations.​




 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top