Preparing for the Putnam Exam: Finding the Right Book

  • Thread starter Thread starter amcavoy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Exam
amcavoy
Messages
663
Reaction score
0
I will be a freshmen next fall and am interested in taking the Putnam, even if I won't do very well. Can someone suggest a good book I can begin working out of now so I can prepare?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
didn't you start a thread like this or reply in one?
anyways i already stated a book in that thread. Author Larson
 
neurocomp2003 said:
didn't you start a thread like this or reply in one?
anyways i already stated a book in that thread. Author Larson
Ahh ok thanks. I haven't been keeping up with that thread so I guess I missed it.

Thanks
 
the putnam is very difficult exam, the problems are very motivating for the motivated math enthuisists though. All the years can be found at kalva demon as well as on american math competition site.
 
Good Putnam level book

Problems and Theorems in Analysis by G. P\dot{o}lya and G. Szeg\ddot{o}, volumes I and II
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top