Pressure At Surface And Scale Height

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the scale height (λ) of a planet's atmosphere using pressure measurements at different altitudes. The user attempts to rearrange the pressure equation but encounters a problem when λ cancels out during the logarithmic transformation. A participant points out an error in the logarithmic manipulation, suggesting a correction to the equation. The user seeks clarification on whether the mistake is minor or if a complete reevaluation is necessary. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful mathematical handling in atmospheric pressure calculations.
bobbles22
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Please can someone tell me if my thinking here is right...

I've got a planet with an atmospheric pressure at 6km of 0.5 P0 and at 8km of 0.4 P0 (P0 = pressure at the surface).

I want to work out the scale height of the atmosphere.

Given scale height = λ

and for height above surface = z

P(z)=P(0)e(-z/λ)

I could rearrange to show the pressure at the surface as:

P(0)=P(z)/e(-z/λ)

I could then use the relative pressure, assume P(0)=1 (as it will cancel out shortly) and height from each of the know quantities and set them equal to each other like this:

0.4/e(-8000/λ) = 0.5/e(-6000/λ)

A little mutliplication...

0.4 e(-6000/λ) = 0.5 e(-8000/λ)

Take the Log of both sides...

(-6000/λ) log 0.4 = (-8000/λ) log 0.5

But know I'm left with the λ cancelling out if I multiply both sides by λ. I'm sure I've gone wrong here somewhere. Probably something very simple. Can anyone advise? Have I made a simple mistake in my working or have I gone completely off the reservation and need to start again? I just need to end up with λ = xxx metres.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi bobbles22! :smile:
bobbles22 said:
0.4 e(-6000/λ) = 0.5 e(-8000/λ)

Take the Log of both sides...

(-6000/λ) log 0.4 = (-8000/λ) log 0.5

nooo :wink:

(-6000/λ) + log 0.4 = (-8000/λ) + log 0.5 :smile:
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top