Pressure changes of a fluid flowing through a horizontal pipe

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 6K views
Photo1234
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
If we have a tube of fluid going like it is shown in the picture, and we measure pressure at two points we would get the same value. But the fluid is still going from point A to point B. So is pressure difference not necessary for fluid flow or I made some other wrong assumptions?
 

Attachments

  • Slika nove bitne slike.jpg
    Slika nove bitne slike.jpg
    9.5 KB · Views: 394
Physics news on Phys.org
Photo1234 said:
So is pressure difference not necessary for fluid flow
Newton's first law. An object in motion will continue in motion at a constant velocity unless acted on by an outside force.
 
What if we use electrons instead of fluid and use Ohms law V = R * I for two points like that, and If V = 0, that current should also be 0. Is that violation of Omhs law?
(We neglect resistance of the wire)
 
Photo1234 said:
What if we use electrons instead of fluid and use Ohms law V = R * I for two points like that, and If V = 0, that current should also be 0. Is that violation of Omhs law?
(We neglect resistance of the wire)

No it is not a violation and it does not need us to neglect the resistance. Let us say R=1, Then V=R*I means 0=1*0. Same answer if R=1000.
 
If we look at two points with the sam voltage in the circuit, then V=0, and R=0, but current flows.
 

Attachments

  • Slika nove bitne slike.jpg
    Slika nove bitne slike.jpg
    12.5 KB · Views: 355
So I = V/R = 0/0

And what causes current if not voltage? Inertia?
 
Photo1234 said:
So I = V/R = 0/0

And what causes current if not voltage? Inertia?
You're trying to find a physical meaning for an assumed - not real - mathematical result of 0/0. There really isn't one. Stick to the physical laws. Stick to the answer you got in post #3 and recognize that simplifications are sometimes useful, but sometimes give nonsensical results.
 
russ_watters said:
You're trying to find a physical meaning for an assumed - not real - mathematical result of 0/0. There really isn't one. Stick to the physical laws. Stick to the answer you got in post #3 and recognize that simplifications are sometimes useful, but sometimes give nonsensical results.

What abaut this:
Photo1234 said:
And what causes current if not voltage? Inertia?