Pressure Drop vs Velocity in a Rectangular Pipe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on modeling fluid flow in a rectangular channel using Comsol, specifically addressing the unexpected linear relationship between pressure drop and velocity. The user anticipates a quadratic curve but consistently obtains a nearly linear graph despite various adjustments to solvers, meshing, and viscosity. Contributors suggest considering frictional losses, heat transfer, and whether the fluid is modeled as compressible or incompressible. They emphasize the importance of providing detailed boundary conditions and grid information for accurate analysis. The conversation highlights the need for further investigation into the modeling parameters to achieve the expected results.
murasame
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys

I am currently using Comsol to model a single rectangular channel, a typical one found in a fuel cell (with symmetry boundary). Dimension of the inlet and outlet area is of the order 10e-3 and the length of the pipe is 0.1 m.

I am having difficulty getting the expected result. The pressure drop vs velocity of fluid flow should be a curve that can be mapped by a second order quadratic equation (as the velocity increases, the pressure increases with increasing rate) But no matter how I try I keep getting a relationship that is close to linear, and only very slightly curved.

Here's what I've done, tried different solvers, played around with the meshing, changed the viscosity, but the result is the same, an almost linear graph, which does not fit the expectation.

Can anyone who is familiar with Comsol offer any advice regards to this problem? Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you taking frictional losses into account? are you taking heat transfer into account? Are you modelling it as a compressible or incompressible substance? Where did you get the expected result from?

if your velocity increases, your static pressure decreases.
 
With such a small diameter, you're going to see a lot of viscous effects, as long as your grid can resolve them.

Before anything can be determined, you'll need to provide some more information such as exact boundary conditions, information on the grid, etc, etc.
 
Try comparing to the pressure drop in a straight tube with a 1-mm diameter using an online calculator such as
http://www.pipeflowcalculations.com/pressuredrop/index.htm
(click on calculator in lower left corner.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top