Pressure losses if going from a 1/2" pipe to 3/4" pipe?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of transitioning from a 1/2" pipe to a 3/4" pipe for a buried water line intended for outdoor use. Participants explore the effects on water pressure and volume, considering factors such as pipe size, flow rate, and energy losses due to friction and turbulence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that changing from a 1/2" to a 3/4" pipe will not decrease the energy of the water, with the speed decreasing and pressure increasing according to Bernoulli's principle.
  • Others argue that the pressure drop through a 3/4" pipe will be lower than through a 5/8" hose, potentially providing more pressure and flow for washing a car or watering a garden.
  • One participant emphasizes that while Bernoulli's principle is relevant, it does not fully explain the situation, as energy dissipation due to friction and turbulence also plays a significant role.
  • There is a suggestion that using a larger pipe can reduce energy losses, making it advantageous for the intended applications.
  • Some participants highlight the conflicting requirements for different applications, noting that car washing may require higher pressure while plant watering may need higher volume flow.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of pipe size on pressure and flow, with no consensus reached on the overall impact of the transition from a 1/2" to a 3/4" pipe. While some assert that pressure would increase, others acknowledge the complexity of the situation, indicating conflicting requirements for different uses.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could affect the discussion, such as energy losses due to friction, the need for considerations related to climate (e.g., freezing), and the specific applications of the water line.

DWDman
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am thinking of burying a 3/4" water line which is tied into my outdoor 1/2" house spigot line. This buried line would run about 100' to where I can better use it for washing a car or irrigating a flowerbed. My question is: by taking the new addition of water line from a 1/2" feed water line to 3/4" water line for 100' and then using a 5/8" hose to wash a car, would I be defeating my purpose by greatly decreasing water pressure and water volume? Since fluid is essentially not compressible, I think not, but need some advice. thanks,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, DWDman!

The pipe size change does not change the energy of the water. The speed of the water will decrease in going from the 1/2" to the 3/4" inch line and the pressure will increase. Bernoulli's principle.

AM
 
DWDman, what are you trying to compare? 100 feet of 3/4 inch pipe compared to 100 feet of 5/8 inch hose? The pressure drop through the pipe will be much lower than if you used hose; leaving you with more pressure & flow to wash the car or water the garden. On the other hand, it would take some work to bury the pipe. Depending on your climate you might need to think about freezing and the need to blow it clear or anti-freeze it for the winter months.
 
Andrew Mason said:
Welcome to PF, DWDman!

The pipe size change does not change the energy of the water. The speed of the water will decrease in going from the 1/2" to the 3/4" inch line and the pressure will increase. Bernoulli's principle.

AM
Bernoulli is only part of what's going on. A pipe with a lot of water flowing through it will dissipate significant Energy due to friction and turbulence. A fatter pipe will involve lower velocity for a given volume rate. This means that, for a given drop in pressure over the length of the pipe, you will get more water through. That is not Bernoulli at work but it is the reason that supply companies use big pipes.
It must be his sexy name that explains why it crops up so often when it may not be most relevant thing at work. (See all the arguments on PF about how aeroplanes fly, too.)
 
sophiecentaur said:
Bernoulli is only part of what's going on. A pipe with a lot of water flowing through it will dissipate significant Energy due to friction and turbulence. A fatter pipe will involve lower velocity for a given volume rate. This means that, for a given drop in pressure over the length of the pipe, you will get more water through. That is not Bernoulli at work but it is the reason that supply companies use big pipes.
It must be his sexy name that explains why it crops up so often when it may not be most relevant thing at work. (See all the arguments on PF about how aeroplanes fly, too.)
Yes, but the question was whether he would "be defeating my purpose by greatly decreasing water pressure and water volume?" It seems to me that the answer to that question is that pressure would not decrease by using the larger line. Rather it will increase.The slower speed in the larger pipe reduces energy losses too. So, it would be a good idea to use the 3/4" line over that 100'.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
Yes, but the question was whether he would "be defeating my purpose by greatly decreasing water pressure and water volume?" It seems to me that the answer to that question is that pressure would not decrease by using the larger line. Rather it will increase.The slower speed in the larger pipe reduces energy losses too. So, it would be a good idea to use the 3/4" line over that 100'.

AM
I don't think we can really be disagreeing (Quote "yes, but"). But there are conflicting requirements when using a hose for different applications. Plant watering will probably need as high a volume flow as possible (= wide supply pipe). Car washing will need pressure with (probably) less actual flow. Either way, the fatter the main length of pipe, the better. It it will give only a small drop in pressure over its length. For the most Kinetic Energy per Second, delivered in the form of a car-washing jet, you want as much pressure as possible just before the nozzle. A nozzle will, of course, lower the pressure (Bernoulli) but the pressure will still be higher because of the fat pipe and the velocity of the water will be higher (more KE) without losing energy on the way there.

No risk of "defeating my purpose" with wide supply pipes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Andrew Mason

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
11K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K