Pressure of supercritical water inside a vessel

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of maintaining pressure in a sealed quartz tube within an autoclave during a reaction at 500°C and 4,500 psi. The user initially attempted to use the ideal gas law but found it inadequate due to the non-ideal behavior of water. They calculated the necessary water volume based on steam density from steam tables but encountered issues with pressure not exceeding 500 psi, possibly due to the quartz tube breaking. There is uncertainty about whether the mass of steam can be equated directly to the mass of water needed for the reaction. The conversation highlights the complexities of pressure dynamics in supercritical water systems and the need for accurate calculations.
Manoffew
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to revive an old project a previous grad student had been toying with. Essentially, the reaction requires a sealed quartz tube (with a dilute acid) to be placed ("free-floating") inside a thick walled-autoclave capable of well over 40,000 PSI. The reaction is run at 500C. I'm trying to figure out how to appropriately equate the two pressures such that the pressure around the free floating quartz tube is the same that is inside the tube, so the tube will not burst. What is the best way to go about this, assuming I know the temperature and pressure I wish to run the reaction?

Homework Equations


Previously, I thought the ideal gas law would work. Obviously, this was not a good approximate since we're dealing with water, which isn't an ideal gas even in gas form... I then used steam tables to find the density of water, which I then multiplied the amount of volume I was wanting to fill at that pressure, and used that mass as the basis of water I needed to add. This did not work.

The Attempt at a Solution


Above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why didn't it work? Show us some numbers.

Chet
 
I found that the density of the critical steam at my desired Temp/Pressure of 500C/4,500 psi would be 120 kg/m^3. I then multiplied this by the (volume of autoclave-volume occupied by floating, sealed quarts tube) which was 24.1ml. From this, I said that I needed 2.904ml of water inside the autoclave (assuming water is 1g/ml and I just said that i needed 2.904g of steam which = the amount of water), and .17ml inside the sealed quartz tube (which had a volume of 1.3ml). The pressure never built inside the autoclave above 500psi- probably because the quartz tube broke and increased the volume of the autoclave. This is why I believe I'm not accurately estimating the pressures based off steam tables. Am I right in assuming that I can just use the mass of the steam and say that (mass of steam from density@volume)=(Mass of water needed)?
 
Manoffew said:
I found that the density of the critical steam at my desired Temp/Pressure of 500C/4,500 psi would be 120 kg/m^3. I then multiplied this by the (volume of autoclave-volume occupied by floating, sealed quarts tube) which was 24.1ml. From this, I said that I needed 2.904ml of water inside the autoclave (assuming water is 1g/ml and I just said that i needed 2.904g of steam which = the amount of water), and .17ml inside the sealed quartz tube (which had a volume of 1.3ml). The pressure never built inside the autoclave above 500psi- probably because the quartz tube broke and increased the volume of the autoclave. This is why I believe I'm not accurately estimating the pressures based off steam tables. Am I right in assuming that I can just use the mass of the steam and say that (mass of steam from density@volume)=(Mass of water needed)?
It looks like you did it correctly. The 120 kg/l looks OK. But, even if the quartz tube broke, shouldn't the volume not have changed? Have you tried the experiment without the quartz tube? It is very puzzling that the pressure never built up above 500 psi. What do you think the reason for this is (not the quartz tube breaking)?

chet
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top