Price of 9 5/8 inch Steel Pipe

  • Thread starter Thread starter celticboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pipe Steel
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the price of 9 5/8 inch steel pipe, specifically how to derive the price per meter from a known price per metric ton. The user has 900 meters of pipe weighing 40 pounds per foot and is trying to confirm their calculations, arriving at a price of $95.24 per meter. However, they encounter discrepancies when attempting to reverse the calculation to find the price per metric ton, which does not match the original $1,600. Participants suggest ensuring unit conversions are consistent and provide a step-by-step method to clarify the calculations. Accurate unit management is emphasized as crucial for correct pricing outcomes.
celticboy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear all

I am trying to work out a price of steel pipe that I have. I have 900 metres of 9 5/8 inch pipe it weighs 40 pounds per foot and the price is $1,600 a metric ton.

Now if I want to get the price per metre then I understand that I have to divide by 2204.62, which is about how many pounds in a ton, then I multiply by pounds per foot, which is 40, then I then multiply by 3.281, which is about how many feet in a metre, and this gives me a price of $95.24 per metre which seems about right.

However what confuses me is that I have noticed that doing it the opposite way does not give me the original $1,600 price. For example to work out price per metre into price per metric ton I would multiply by 3.281 then multiply by 2204.62 and then divide by 40 (pounds per foot) This gives me an answer of 17,222 which is not the original $1,600. And so therefore I have concluded that I am doing something wrong somewhere in one of these, or both of these equations. I would appreciate any feedback that is given.

Regards

Chris
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
First, find out how many feet you have (divide the total length in inches by 12"), then multiple the number of feet by 40, giving you your total weight. Convert to tonnes and you have your cost.
 
Keep your units straight!


First convert meters to feet:
m x ft/m = ft

Now find out how much that weighs in pounds:
ft x lb/ft = lb

Convert pounds to kg:
lb * kg/lb = kg

then find the price:
kg x $/kg = $
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top