Primo Levi's Calculation: Human Mass on Earth's Surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Markolie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Human Surface
AI Thread Summary
Primo Levi's calculation suggests that if the total human mass of 250 million metric tons were distributed evenly across the Earth's surface, it would create a "human surface" thickness of 16,000ths of a millimeter. This calculation is based on the assumption that the density of the human body is approximately 1,000 kg/m³ and that the Earth's surface area is about 510 million km². The discussion reflects confusion among participants regarding the methodology behind this calculation and its origins in Levi's book "Il sistema periodico." Participants express difficulty in understanding the math involved and seek clarification on the topic. The conversation highlights the intriguing intersection of literature and scientific inquiry.
Markolie
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Primo Levi: "Human Surface"

Homework Statement


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101205082200AAZCums

What calculation did Primo Levi use to get the following conclusion:
According to Primo Levi's book, if the human mass of 250 million metric ton would be spread over the surface of earth, the thickness of the "human surface" is 16000st of a millimeter.
The density of a human body in this case would be 1000kg/m3. Surface Earth = 510 million km2

Homework Equations


None


The Attempt at a Solution


I wouldn't have the slightest idea to solve this.

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you make this up? What book is this? :confused:
 


I'm totally confused myself too. None of my friends could solve it either. I'm sorry if it isn't fully understandable because I'm Dutch :).

Book: "Il sistema periodico ("The Periodic Table") p.168 (Primo Levi) I think...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top