Principle of Conservation of Linear Momentum

AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of a plate breaking into three pieces, the principle of conservation of linear momentum is applied, focusing on both x and y components. Since the total momentum parallel to the floor must remain zero, the x-momenta of pieces 1 and 2 must balance each other, while the y-momenta must account for the downward velocity of piece 3. The equations will involve the masses of pieces 1 and 2, denoted as m1 and m2, and their respective velocities. Two equations are necessary to solve for the two unknowns, m1 and m2, by balancing the momentum in both the x and y directions. This approach will yield the required masses of the pieces after applying the conservation laws correctly.
helen3743
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I also need help how to start his problem:

"By accident, a large plate is dropped and breaks into three pieces. The pieces fly apart parallel to the floor, with v1 = 3.10 m/s and v2 = 1.60 m/s. As the plate falls, its momentum has only a vertical component, and no component parallel to the floor. After the collision, the component of the total momentum parallel to the floor must remain zero, since the net external force acting on the plate has no component parallel to the floor. Using the data shown in the drawing, find the masses of pieces 1 and 2."

In the drawing, it shows m1 & m2 falling at an angle to the floor but m3 has no angle, and just has a velocity of 3.07 m/s pointing down with a mass of 1.3kg.

How would the formula look like to solve this problem?
I know the normal formula looks like:
x comp & y comp:
m1vf1 + m2vf2 =m1vo1 + m2vo2

I know how to find velocities incorporation the angles, (like doing m1sin25)but I don't know where to fit in the third mass in the formula.

Do you? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have two unknowns, m1 and m2.

That means you need two equations. Balance the x-momenta for one equation, and balance the y-momenta for the other.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top