Probabilities of Random Guessing

JamesCreswell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am a student in high school and I possesses a keen proclivity for mathematics and physics. A contentious topic of discussion has come up among my friends, and I seek some assistance in resolving it.

A few days ago in my AP Chemistry class, the instructor told us that were we to have to guess on a multiple choice test, it would be advantageous to always pick the same choice (that is, consistently and solely choosing answer choice X for every question that must be guessed on will produce a higher expected score than will randomly selecting an answer choice for each question individually).

To this I object. Surely, regardless of the method of guessing employed, the expected score is always 20% (assuming 5 answer choices)? Am I incorrect? Can a proof or some sophisticated and impeccable logic be assembled on either side?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct in that the expected score will be the same in either case. The only advantage of picking the same choice would be a smaller deviation, assuming that the test was set up that the correct answers were set to be uniformly distributed.
 
If instructor's method is a faster method of guessing than varying your choices, it would give you more time to consider the questions where you are not completely guessing. That additional time might improve your score. That's the only advantage I see in your instructor's approach.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top