Probability and chance of failure

AI Thread Summary
An experiment with a 96% success rate conducted 100 times has a 6.96% chance of experiencing exactly one failure. The probability of encountering at least one failure in those trials is significantly higher, at 98.3%. This calculation utilizes the Binomial Distribution to determine the probabilities for both scenarios. Understanding the distinction between "exactly one" and "at least one" failure is crucial for accurate probability assessment. Overall, the high likelihood of at least one failure highlights the importance of considering cumulative probabilities in repeated trials.
Zach_C
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Ok, not really homework but I did not want to crowd general math.

I have an experiment that has 96% chance of working. If I try it one hundred times what is the chance of one being a failure.

I know with a one in two shot it is .5^2=.25 You now have a 25 percent chance of failure. Any help. Sorry at the moment my brain seems dead.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oh my God I'm an idiot. I really am more tired than this thread let's on. :zzz:
 
Try solving the opposite problem.
 
Zach_C said:
Ok, not really homework but I did not want to crowd general math.

I have an experiment that has 96% chance of working. If I try it one hundred times what is the chance of one being a failure.

I know with a one in two shot it is .5^2=.25 You now have a 25 percent chance of failure. Any help. Sorry at the moment my brain seems dead.
Do you want the probability for "EXACTLY 1" Failure or for "AT LEAST 1" Failure?? Both can be determined from the Binomial Distribution:
Prob{Exactly 1 Failure} = (99)*{(0.96)^(99)}*{(1 - 0.96)^(1)} =
= (0.0696) = (6.96 %)
Prob{At Least 1 Failure} = 1 - Prob{Exactly 0 Failures} = 1 - (0.96)^100 =
= (0.983) = (98.3 %)


~~
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top