Probability density function of digital filter

purplebird
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
given that x has an exponential density function ie p(x) = exp (-x) and x(n) & x(m) are statistically independent.

Now y(n) = x(n-1)+x(n)

what is the pdf (probability density function) of y(n)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
purplebird said:
given that x has an exponential density function ie p(x) = exp (-x) and x(n) & x(m) are statistically independent.

Now y(n) = x(n-1)+x(n)

what is the pdf (probability density function) of y(n)

The pdf of a sum of two independent variables can be obtained by the convolution of their respective pdf's.
 
Y(n) will be distributed as gamma(2,1) if X(n) has the pdf exp[-x(n)].
 
I made a mistake while typing up the question :

y(n) = [x(n-1) + x(n)]^2

so

y(n) = x(n)^2 + x(n-1)^2

So is the pdf of y(n) convolution of exp(-x(n)^2) and exp(-x(n-1)^2)

Thanks
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top