Probability distribution function proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The function p(x) = (3/4b³)(b² - x²) for -b ≤ x ≤ +b is validated as a probability distribution function through integration. The integral of p(x) from -b to b must equal 1, which was initially miscalculated as 4/3. The correct evaluation shows that the integral simplifies to 1, confirming its validity as a probability distribution function. This discussion highlights the importance of careful integration and verification in probability proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of probability distribution functions
  • Knowledge of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically integration techniques
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the properties of probability distribution functions
  • Practice integration of polynomial functions
  • Learn about normalization conditions for probability distributions
  • Explore common mistakes in calculus and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

Students studying probability and statistics, educators teaching calculus, and anyone interested in mathematical proofs related to probability distributions.

Pomico
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Probability distribution function proof

Homework Statement



Prove the function p(x) = \frac{3}{4b^{3}}(b^{2}-x^{2}) for -b \leq x \leq +b is a valid probability distribution function.

Homework Equations



I'm not sure if it's as simple as this, but I've been using \int p(x) dx (between b and -b) = 1 if the function is valid


The Attempt at a Solution



\int p(x) dx (between b and -b) = \frac{3x}{4b} - \frac{x^{3}}{12b^{3}} between b and -b = \frac{3}{4} - \frac{1}{12} + \frac{3}{4} - \frac{1}{12} = \frac{4}{3}

I treated b as a constant as I was integrating with respect to x, but clearly \frac{4}{3} is not equal to 1... please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to have forgotten the "3" in "3/4" when you multiplied \frac{x^3}{3} by \frac{3}{4b^3}. You should have
\frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}+ \frac{3}{4}- \frac{1}{4}= 1
 
Heh thanks, stupid mistake...
I assumed it was the integration I got wrong as opposed to an earlier stage, I'll check more thoroughly next time!
Thanks again :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K