Probability flux integrated over all space is mean momentum?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between probability flux and mean momentum as outlined in Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics". Specifically, it clarifies that the mean momentum is derived from the expectation value of the momentum operator, represented as ##\hat{\vec{p}} = -\mathrm{i} \hbar \vec{\nabla}##. The integration process involves applying integration by parts to the expectation value formula, leading to the conclusion that the probability flux integrated over all space equates to the mean momentum, as stated in Eq. (2.192).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the momentum operator in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation used in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the expectation value in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about integration by parts in the context of quantum mechanics
  • Explore Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" for deeper insights on momentum and probability flux
  • Investigate applications of the momentum operator in various quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on wave functions and operators, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum theory.

euphoricrhino
Messages
23
Reaction score
14
In Sakurai Modern Quantum Mechanics, I came across a statement which says probabiliy flux integrated over all space is just the mean momentum (eq 2.192 below). I was wondering if anybody can help me explain how this is obtained.
I can see that ##i\hbar\nabla## is taken as the ##\mathbf{p}## operator, but I don't see how the integration gives the mean of ##\mathbf{p}##.
Thanks in advance!

Screen Shot 2022-08-11 at 15.28.15.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gentzen
Physics news on Phys.org
The expectation value of the momentum is
$$\langle \vec{p} \rangle = \langle \psi|\hat{\vec{p}}|\psi \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) (-\mathrm{i} \hbar \vec{\nabla}) \psi(t,\vec{x}).$$
Now you can add the same expression with the ##\nabla## put to ##\psi^*## by partial integration and divide by 2:
$$\langle \vec{p} \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x (-\mathrm{i} \hbar) [\psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \vec{\nabla} \psi(t,\vec{x}) - \psi(t,\vec{x}) \vec{\nabla} \psi^*(t,\vec{x})].$$
Comparing this with Eq. (2.191) of the book you get immediately Eq. (2.192).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lord Jestocost, gentzen, PeroK and 1 other person
Great, thanks a lot.
I missed the integration by part trick. This is awesome!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 153 ·
6
Replies
153
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K