A Probability flux integrated over all space is mean momentum?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between probability flux and mean momentum in quantum mechanics, specifically referencing Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics. The key point is that the mean momentum can be derived from the probability flux by integrating the probability density over all space. The integration involves using the momentum operator, represented as ##i\hbar\nabla##, and applying integration by parts to manipulate the terms. This leads to a clear connection between the expectation value of momentum and the probability flux, confirming the statement in the book. The integration by parts technique is highlighted as a crucial step in understanding this relationship.
euphoricrhino
Messages
22
Reaction score
7
In Sakurai Modern Quantum Mechanics, I came across a statement which says probabiliy flux integrated over all space is just the mean momentum (eq 2.192 below). I was wondering if anybody can help me explain how this is obtained.
I can see that ##i\hbar\nabla## is taken as the ##\mathbf{p}## operator, but I don't see how the integration gives the mean of ##\mathbf{p}##.
Thanks in advance!

Screen Shot 2022-08-11 at 15.28.15.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expectation value of the momentum is
$$\langle \vec{p} \rangle = \langle \psi|\hat{\vec{p}}|\psi \rangle = \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x \psi^*(t,\vec{x}) (-\mathrm{i} \hbar \vec{\nabla}) \psi(t,\vec{x}).$$
Now you can add the same expression with the ##\nabla## put to ##\psi^*## by partial integration and divide by 2:
$$\langle \vec{p} \rangle = \frac{1}{2} \int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 x (-\mathrm{i} \hbar) [\psi^*(t,\vec{x}) \vec{\nabla} \psi(t,\vec{x}) - \psi(t,\vec{x}) \vec{\nabla} \psi^*(t,\vec{x})].$$
Comparing this with Eq. (2.191) of the book you get immediately Eq. (2.192).
 
  • Like
Likes Lord Jestocost, gentzen, PeroK and 1 other person
Great, thanks a lot.
I missed the integration by part trick. This is awesome!
 
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads