Probability Greater than 1 in λφ^4 Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoduck
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    S-matrix
geoduck
Messages
257
Reaction score
2
Take a \lambda \phi^4 theory. To first order in λ, the 2x2 scattering amplitude is:

iM=-iλ

So the amplitude <f|S|i> is then <f|(1+iM)|i>=<f|i>+iM<f|i>.

Letting f=i, the probability is greater than 1! It is equal to the norm |1+iM| which is sqrt[1^2+λ^2].

How is it that two particles in the state |i> have a probability greater than 1 of being in the same state |i> after scattering?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you do a perturbative calculation to some order in ##\lambda##, you can only expect unitarity to hold up to that order in ##\lambda##. ##\sqrt{1 + \lambda^2} = 1 + O(\lambda^2)##, so the unitarity violation is higher order in ##\lambda## than the accuracy of the first-order perturbative calculation, which is only accurate up to ##O(\lambda)##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
898
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top