Probability of a random number - seems impossible

raspberryh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi guys,

I have a question re: random numbers and probability. If I have a random number generator that generates a number between 1 and 10, and say I generate a kazillion of these numbers, then doesn't each number have the same probability of showing up? So then, after a kazillion numbers, I could take the average of all these random numbers I've generated and the average should be 5.

However, these numbers are random. Which means all this stuff just goes out the window basically - right? I mean, the probability that I would get all 9s a kazillion times should be the same as the probability that I get an even distribution of all numbers - right?

And if this is true, then that means if I have a 6-sided die, then the probability that I get the same side every time a kazillion times in a row should be the same as the probability that I can have an even distribution. Because it is random, and you never know with random.

And I know you might say that if we wait until we generate an infinity amount of random numbers, THEN we would have even distribution... however, isn't it possible that you could get 9s infinity times in a row? It must be, because it is random!

Please help. My world is falling apart.

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
However, these numbers are random. Which means all this stuff just goes out the window basically - right? I mean, the probability that I would get all 9s a kazillion times should be the same as the probability that I get an even distribution of all numbers - right?
Wrong. There is only one way to get all 9s, but there are many ways to get a set of numbers whose average is approximately 5 (law of large numbers).
 
Mathman is right,getting a kazillion 9s is not equiprobable to getting an even distribution,i.e it can only happen in 1 way while the numbers can be evenly distributed a number of different ways e.g. the probability of 6000 6s in 6000 throws of a die is not even close to being equal to the probability of 1000 1s,2s,3s,4s,5s and 6s.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top