MHB What's the probability of selecting John and then James as disciples of Jesus?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
AI Thread Summary
The probability of selecting John and then James as disciples of Jesus is calculated based on the total number of disciples, which is 12. The probability of choosing John first is 1/12, and after selecting John, the probability of choosing James next is 1/11. Therefore, the combined probability of selecting John and then James is 1/(12*11), resulting in 1/132. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the problem-solving process rather than just receiving answers. Engaging with the material step-by-step is crucial for deeper comprehension.
mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
Jesus had 12 disciples. What's the probability of selecting John and then James?

What is the set up?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Basically, you keep asking same question over and over again! Are you actually learning anything?

If you have n objects, the probability of choosing anyone of them is 1/n. If you have n objects, once you have chosen one, without replacement, there are n- 1 objects left. The probability of choosing anyone of those n- 1 objects is 1/(n-1). When the probability of event A is p and the probability of event B is q, the probability of "event A and event B" is pq.

Here n= 12. The probability of choosing "John" first is 1/12. The probability of choosing "James" next is 1/11. The probability of choosing "John" and then "James" is 1/(11*12)= 1/132.
 
Thank you very much.
 
Hey RTCNC,

I do agree that this question is similar to the one you asked yesterday, so for me that only highlights the fact that you should work with us step-by-step to truly understand these problems. If someone just solves it for you, you won't be able to easily transfer that to other problems. Why don't you post what you've tried and your thoughts on it? Do you agree with what I'm saying conceptually?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top