Probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple HO

In summary: Excellent thanks for the additional info!This probably strays away from the original question already, but since we're on the topic of wavefunction "nodes", the vanishing of the wavefunction at the boundaries of an infinite square well potential are not considered as "nodes".
  • #1
rwooduk
762
59

Homework Statement


What is the probability of finding the particle at x=0 for a simple harmonic oscillator.

Homework Equations


[tex]\Psi _{0} = (\frac{m\omega}{\pi\hbar})^{\frac{1}{4}} exp (\frac{-m\omega x^{2}}{2\hbar})[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Going back to basics with this one, too much revision, can't think straight! Please could someone confirm that the probability is:

[tex]P(x=0)= |\Psi (0)|^{2} = (\frac{m\omega}{\pi \hbar})^{\frac{1}{2}}[/tex]

dont know why I'm getting confused with this, feel as though it should be zero at x=0 and the only way to get this would be integrating the term also.

thanks again for any advice
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
rwooduk said:
dont know why I'm getting confused with this, feel as though it should be zero at x=0
Why do you think it should be zero at x = 0?
Also, just to be pedantic, it is not right to speak of the probability finding a particle at a particular position, because position is a continuous observable. You probably mean the probability per unit length of finding the particle about x = 0.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
  • #3
Fightfish said:
Why do you think it should be zero at x = 0?
Also, just to be pedantic, it is not right to speak of the probability finding a particle at a particular position, because position is a continuous observable. You probably mean the probability per unit length of finding the particle about x = 0.
Good point! there is no reason why it would be zero, i was thinking of an infinite well for some reason. And yes it's a bit of a funny question asking for a specfic position. Many thanks for your help!
 
  • #5
Fightfish said:
In fact, it cannot be zero - there cannot be any nodes in the probability distribution for a particle in the ground state:
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/70/8/10.1119/1.1479742

I'm not back at University so can't access this paper, but I would be interested to know what this means to the following statement:

A wave function node occurs at points where the wave function is zero and changes signs. The electron has zero probability of being located at a node.

and inparticular how it applies to the ground state wave function of an infinite well at the boundaries.

thanks again for the reply!
 
  • #6
IS the ground state explicitly mentioned in the exercise ?
 
  • #7
BvU said:
IS the ground state explicitly mentioned in the exercise ?

Hi, yes the ground state wave function is given.
 
  • #8
Well, then the probability density follows from the wave function. You've done that already in post 1. Seems the best answer to me.
Happily sitting there with a minimum energy that still satisfies the uncertainty principle.

Asking for the probability at x=0 is unphysical :) (post #2)
Expectation value for x in ground state is 0, though.

Re infinite well: if it's a square well, continuity of the wave function forces ##\Psi = 0## at the walls.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk
  • #9
BvU said:
Well, then the probability density follows from the wave function. You've done that already in post 1. Seems the best answer to me.
Happily sitting there with a minimum energy that still satisfies the uncertainty principle.

Asking for the probability at x=0 is unphysical :) (post #2)
Expectation value for x in ground state is 0, though.

Re infinite well: if it's a square well, continuity of the wave function forces ##\Psi = 0## at the walls.

excellent thanks for the additional info!
 
  • #10
This probably strays away from the original question already, but since we're on the topic of wavefunction "nodes", the vanishing of the wavefunction at the boundaries of an infinite square well potential are not considered as "nodes".

In the wavefunction picture, a node occurs when the wavefunction "changes sign" and crosses the axis. In terms of the probability density picture, a node would manifest itself as a stationary point (one that touches the axis, of course). There are some interesting theorems concerning the number of nodes and the level of the energy eigenfunctions if you like to investigate further.
 
  • Like
Likes rwooduk

1. What is the probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple harmonic oscillator (HO)?

The probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple HO is dependent on the amplitude of the oscillator, the energy level of the particle, and the specific time at which the measurement is taken. It can be calculated using the wave function of the particle.

2. Is the probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple HO constant?

No, the probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple HO is not constant. It varies depending on the parameters mentioned in the previous question and can change over time as the particle oscillates.

3. How does the amplitude of a simple HO affect the probability of finding a particle at x=0?

The amplitude of a simple HO is directly proportional to the probability of finding a particle at x=0. This means that as the amplitude increases, the probability of finding the particle at x=0 also increases.

4. Can the probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple HO be greater than 1?

No, the probability of finding a particle at x=0 for a simple HO cannot be greater than 1. This is because the probability is a measure of how likely it is for the particle to be at a certain position, and a probability greater than 1 would mean that the particle is certain to be at x=0, which is not physically possible.

5. How does the energy level of a particle affect the probability of finding it at x=0 for a simple HO?

The energy level of a particle in a simple HO is directly proportional to the probability of finding it at x=0. This means that as the energy level increases, the probability of finding the particle at x=0 also increases. This is because particles with higher energy levels have larger amplitudes, making it more likely for them to be found at the maximum displacement (x=0).

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
556
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
813
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
895
Replies
3
Views
861
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
210
Back
Top