Probability of finding particle in half of a box for a given state

trelek2
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Basically this is easy stuff I'm doing but i'n not sure whether i made a mistake or my answer is actually correct physically.

I'm solving the 1-dimensional TISE for a particle confined to a box -a<x<a.

I found that the eigenfunctions for this particle in a box with periodic boundary conditions are:u _{n}(x)=Ae ^{ \frac{in \pi x}{a} } I'm pretty sure that this is correct.
I normalised A and got A= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{2a} }, which I'm also confident about.
And now I compute probability of finding particle in region 0<x<a when it is in state:
\psi (x)= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{2} }[u _{1}(x)+iu _{2}(x)]
I get that it is 1/2-1/pi which is about 0.2... Is that correct? Or should it be rather 1/2 simply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
trelek2 said:
Basically this is easy stuff I'm doing but i'n not sure whether i made a mistake or my answer is actually correct physically.

I'm solving the 1-dimensional TISE for a particle confined to a box -a<x<a.

I found that the eigenfunctions for this particle in a box with periodic boundary conditions are:u _{n}(x)=Ae ^{ \frac{in \pi x}{a} } I'm pretty sure that this is correct.
I normalised A and got A= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{2a} }, which I'm also confident about.
And now I compute probability of finding particle in region 0<x<a when it is in state:
\psi (x)= \frac{1}{ \sqrt{2} }[u _{1}(x)+iu _{2}(x)]
I get that it is 1/2-1/pi which is about 0.2... Is that correct? Or should it be rather 1/2 simply.

Be careful that you are meeting the boundary conditions. I assume you are talking about an infinite square well. If this is the case, the wave functions that you use have to be 0 at x=a, and x=-a. I believe this gives the solutions: u _{n}(x)=\sqrt{\frac{2}{a}}sin ( \frac{n \pi}{2a} (x+a))

Now whatever \psi(x) you use, the probability of finding the particle in region 0<x<a is \int_0^a |\psi(x)|^2 dx
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top