Probability of normally distributed life lengths

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the probability that the mean lifelength of standard light bulbs exceeds that of newly designed bulbs, given their respective means and standard deviations. The central limit theorem is applied due to the sample size of 36 for both bulb types. Initial calculations using the z-score formula were critiqued for treating the bulbs as a single population, prompting a more accurate approach that considers both populations independently. The correct method involves calculating the probability of the difference between the two normally distributed means, leading to a clearer understanding of the statistical relationship. The conversation highlights the importance of correctly setting up hypotheses and using independent distributions for accurate probability assessments.
boneill3
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A standard light bulb is claimed to have a lifelength of 8000 hours with standard deviation of 800 hours.
A newly designed light bulb is claimed to have a life length of 9200 hours with a standard deviation of 600 hours

Homework Equations



If 36 standard and 36 newly designed bulbs are tested what is the probability that the mean lifelength of the standard bulbs will be greater than the mean lifelength of the newly designed bulbs.


<br /> z = \frac{X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



Since the sample size is greater than 30, the central limit theorem can be used

<br /> z = \frac{X-\mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}<br />

We have \sigma = 600
n = 36
\mu= 9200 ( the mean of the newly designed bulbs.)
X = 8000 ( the mean of the standard bulbs.)

Putting those into the formula we get:

<br /> z = \frac{8000-9200}{\frac{\600}{\sqrt{36}}}<br />


<br /> z = \frac{8000-9200}{\frac{400}{3}}<br />

= -1

which -1 standard deviations from mean so equates to aprroximately .85 on the normal distribution.

So the probability that the mean lifelength of the standard bulbs will be greater than the mean lifelength of the newly designed bulbs.

equals 1-0.85 = .15

How does that look ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think your work is correct at all. You are treating the problem as if you had one population of light bulbs, but clearly there are two, each with its own std. dev., and possibly its own mean (which is what you are testing).

This are the hypotheses I believe you need to test:

H0: \mu_Y = \mu_X
H1: \mu_Y &gt; \mu_X

where X represents the lifetimes of the older bulbs, and Y represents the lifetimes of the redesigned bulbs.

The statistic to work with is
<br /> Z = \frac{\overline{Y} - \overline{X} - (\mu_Y - \mu_X)}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_Y^2}{n} + \frac{\sigma_X^2}{m}}}<br />
 
In the formula you gave

Z = \frac{\overline{Y} - \overline{X} - (\mu_Y - \mu_X)}{\sqrt{\frac{\sigma_Y^2}{n} + \frac{\sigma_X^2}{m}}}

You are using the sample mean of X and Y \overline{Y}\text{ and } \overline{X}

How would I calculate those values?

I have
<br /> \mu Y = 9200

\mu X = 8000

\sigma_Y^2 = 600^2

\sigma_X^2 = 800^2

n = 36

<br /> m = 36<br />
regards
 
You raise a good point. On second thought, I take back what I said, and agree with your approach, with this change:
X = 9200, and \mu = 8000. You should get a positive value for z.

Is there some information about the confidence level given in the problem, that you didn't show?
 
I don't think this is a hypothesis question at all.
You can use the CLT to work out the distribution for the mean life of the standard bulb, and also for the mean life of the new bulb.
You now have two new normal distributions - I'll call them S for the standard, N for the new.
Since they correspond to two different populations, it is safe to assume they are independent: you need to calculate
<br /> \Pr(S -N &gt; 0)<br />

("what is the probability the mean life of the standard bulbs exceeds the mean life of the new bulbs?)

Since S and N are independent, S - N also is normally distributed, and you can find the desired probability quite easily.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top