I Probably a Dumb Question: How are E and (delta)V correlated?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the correlation between electric field (E) and electric potential (V), specifically exploring the equations ΔV = Ed and V = kq/r. It clarifies that ΔV = Ed applies only in uniform electric fields, while V = kq/r pertains to point charges, where the electric field is not uniform. When E = 0, the change in electric potential (ΔV) is also zero, but this does not imply that the potential V itself is zero. The relationship between electric field and potential is defined by E = -∇V, emphasizing that E is a vector quantity. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the concepts of electric fields and potentials in physics.
Iftekhar Uddin
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
What I Think I Understand: ΔV = Ed (d being dstance) and that V = kq/r

please correct me if I'm misunderstanding those.

What I need to know: When E = 0, what happens to the electric potential? and vice versa.

Me Working it out: So if i use the first equation up here, If E = 0, then electric Potential = 0. Even with the second equation wouldn't I compare the net electric field with the net potential at a point? If so, then my answer remains the same. Either my equations are wrong or I'm really misunderstanding a simple concept. I may just be reaching my burnout point with physics right now. (I'm a few days in of focused physics studying and I can't wrap my head around simple concepts like this anymore.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Iftekhar Uddin said:
So if i use the first equation up here, If E = 0, then electric Potential = 0.
No; where E = 0 the change in electric potential = 0. (ΔV = 0)
 
Doc Al said:
No; where E = 0 the change in electric potential = 0. (ΔV = 0)

Then does that apply to just V as well? And thanks for the quick response! :)
 
Iftekhar Uddin said:
Then does that apply to just V as well?
If I understand you correctly, no.
 
Iftekhar Uddin said:
Even with the second equation wouldn't I compare the net electric field with the net potential at a point?
That second equation describes the potential at some distance from a positive charge. (It assumes V = 0 when infinitely far from the charge.)
 
  • Like
Likes Iftekhar Uddin
Iftekhar Uddin said:
What I Think I Understand: ΔV = Ed (d being dstance) and that V = kq/r

please correct me if I'm misunderstanding those.

What I need to know: When E = 0, what happens to the electric potential? and vice versa.

Me Working it out: So if i use the first equation up here, If E = 0, then electric Potential = 0. Even with the second equation wouldn't I compare the net electric field with the net potential at a point? If so, then my answer remains the same. Either my equations are wrong or I'm really misunderstanding a simple concept. I may just be reaching my burnout point with physics right now. (I'm a few days in of focused physics studying and I can't wrap my head around simple concepts like this anymore.)
The two equations that you gave are valid for two separate situations. ΔV = Ed is valid if the electric field is uniform. If it is not, then the relation is approximately valid only for short distances, and along a direction parallel to the field.
The second equation, V = kq/r gives the potential of a point charge q at the origin. In this case, the electric field is not uniform, so your first equation ΔV = Ed is not correct.
In all cases, the relation between electrostatic field and potential is: E = - ∇V. I typed E in bold to state that E is a vector.
 
Back
Top