Problem in constructing Matrix representation in |↑↓> basis

ck00
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
If I want to derive the matrix representation for operator Q in the |S1=1/2 ,m1> |S2=1/2 ,m2 > basis, where |Si,mi> are common eigenstates of S2 , Si,z for the ith particle.

And I do it in this way:
<↑↑|Q|↑↑> <↑↑|Q|↑↓> <↑↓|Q|↓↑> <↑↑|Q|↓↓>
<↑↓|Q|↑↑> <↑↓|Q|↑↓> <↑↓|Q|↓↑> <↑↓|Q|↓↓>
... ... ... ...
... ... ... ...

|↑↑>=|S1=1/2 ,m1=+1/2> |S2=1/2 ,m2=+1/2 >
Is it correct?
THANKS
 
Physics news on Phys.org
can anyone help?
 
Let's see...the ij component (row i, column j) in the basis \{e_i\} is Q_{ij}=(Qe_j)_i=\langle e_i,Qe_j\rangle. In bra-ket notation, Q_{ij}=\langle i|Q|j\rangle. So everything on your first row should have the same "bra", but one of them is different from the other three. I suspect it's just a typo, since the rest of it looks fine.
 
Fredrik said:
Let's see...the ij component (row i, column j) in the basis \{e_i\} is Q_{ij}=(Qe_j)_i=\langle e_i,Qe_j\rangle. In bra-ket notation, Q_{ij}=\langle i|Q|j\rangle. So everything on your first row should have the same "bra", but one of them is different from the other three. I suspect it's just a typo, since the rest of it looks fine.

oh,ya, you are right, it's just a typo. Thanks for teaching:smile:
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top