Is Manned Space Travel More Beneficial Than Robot-Controlled Missions?

AI Thread Summary
Manned space travel is often viewed as more beneficial than robot-controlled missions due to its potential for direct human observation and interaction with the environment. Participants argue that initial robotic probes can gather essential data, allowing for better preparation before sending humans. This approach enables the development of suitable technology and training for astronauts. Furthermore, the excitement and inspiration generated by human presence in space can significantly impact scientific research and society. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of a phased approach to space exploration, starting with robotic missions to inform future manned endeavors.

What are your thoughts on space travel/exploration?

  • No. Waste of money.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Yes, but should be limited to robotic probes.

    Votes: 2 8.7%

  • Yes, robotic probes for now, with human bases later.

    Votes: 16 69.6%

  • Yes, we should go with a human program wherever possible.

    Votes: 5 21.7%
  • Total voters
    23
FZ+
Messages
1,594
Reaction score
3
This is a continuation of the why space travel thread. Try to keep the discussion over there, ok?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
yep. i chose 3 option. find out what a place is like (probes) than create a suitable ship and suits, train people. probe with humans. then colonise.
 
An abvious choice to me: Let's ride !
 
I also chose the third option since it seems most logical...it's better to know what's out there before sending in humans...
 
indeed. it seems logical to 'research' what you are heading into. that allows you to create scenarios of the environment.. etc etc.

I'd love to just go out and have a space walk... that would be so cool, i reckon.
 
Are there any characteristics that manned-missions in space are better e.g. impact on scientific research and society, than robot-contolled missions?
 

Thread 'Our Beautiful Universe - Photos and Videos'

This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
View full post »

Thread 'Asteroid 2024 YR4 has a 1% risk of a multi-megaton impact in 2032 (now ruled out)'

Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
View full post »

Similar threads

Human factors, technology and deep space missions
Replies
7
Views
1K
Oceans vs Outer Space: Colonization & Resources
Replies
14
Views
4K
I Info traveling faster than light, and quantum entanglement
Replies
7
Views
2K
Writing: Input Wanted A dangerous space mission that requires a lot of helping hands
Replies
22
Views
4K
How Long Would Scifi Space Travel Really Take?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Can I Travel Faster Than Light While Considering Relativity?
Replies
6
Views
16K
How Can We Harness the Power of Space Elevators and Atmospheric Electricity?
Replies
7
Views
2K
A manned mission to Mars and its obstacles
Replies
5
Views
9K
Is Faster-Than-Light Travel Possible in Theory?
Replies
19
Views
3K
What is the future of USAA in commercial space travel?
Replies
1
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top