Why Is Calculating the Speed of the 0.89g Particle Post-Collision Challenging?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the speed of the 0.89 g particle post-collision is challenging due to insufficient information regarding the nature of the collision, such as whether it is elastic or inelastic. The user attempted to apply momentum conservation in both the X and Y directions but arrived at two different speeds, 955 m/s and 478 m/s, indicating a potential error in their calculations. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on energy conservation in the collision to accurately determine the final speeds. Without knowing the specifics of the collision type, the calculations cannot yield a definitive answer. Properly defining the collision parameters is essential for solving the problem accurately.
Xamfy19
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I have doubt for the following question. Please help.

A 4.5 g particle moving at 170 m/s collides with 0.89 g particle initially at rest. After the collision the two particles have velocities that are directed 26 deg on either side of the original line of motion of the 4.5 g particle. What is the speed of the 0.89 g particl after the collision?

I used momentum conservation for X and Y direction to obtain 955 m/s, which was wrong.

Px = 4.5 * 170 = 4.5V1cos26 + 0.89V2cos26

for Py
4.5 V1Sin26 = 0.89 V2sin26


Thanks alot.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will have to use momentum conservation to solve this. And momentum conservation will be correct.

But you haven't supplied enough information to solve the problem. Is the collision perfectly elastic? Partially inelastic? Is energy conserved?

cookiemonster
 
Moved from accidental new thread (which I will now delete):
Originally posted by Xamfy19
That all I have from the question. I assumed the system is elastic collision. I use momentum conservation to solve and got two different answers. One is 955 m/s and another is 478 m/s. Then, I used energy conserve to prove and both of the answer are wrong. I wonder where I did wrong.
Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top