Problem of the week - gravitation

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoyigloria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravitation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the variation of apparent weight due to Earth's rotation, emphasizing that this weight differs at the equator compared to the poles. The gravitational force formula is suggested to calculate these differences, with specific values noted: 9.780 m·s−2 at the equator and 9.832 m·s−2 at the poles. The concept of treating Earth as a perfect sphere is mentioned, impacting the calculations of gravitational force. The key takeaway is that the centripetal acceleration due to Earth's rotation results in a 0.35% decrease in apparent weight at the equator compared to the poles. Understanding these principles helps clarify the problem presented.
yoyigloria
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I received this problem this week and no one in my class has been able to solve it. We don't need to solve it exactly, but we should provide a conceptual answer. I would really appreciate it if anyone could help me out.
-The apparent weight of a person may vary in different latitudes due to the rotation of the earth. If the apparent weight is the force that the scale makes on the person, determine the variation in the apparent weight of a person at the equator and at one of the poles.

THANKS!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In general the force that the scale reads is the gravitational force between the Earth and the person.

So use the formula for gravitational force and the radius of the Earth at the equator and the poles. That should give you the differing weights.
 
rock.freak667 said:
In general the force that the scale reads is the gravitational force between the Earth and the person.

So use the formula for gravitational force and the radius of the Earth at the equator and the poles. That should give you the differing weights.

9.780 m·s−2 at the equator to about 9.832 m·s−2

gh = go((re)/(h+re))^2

gravity at a height = gravity standard (radius earth/(height + radius earth))^2
 
I forgot to say that we are to regard the Earth as perfect sphere.
 
Liquidxlax said:
9.780 m·s−2 at the equator to about 9.832 m·s−2

gh = go((re)/(h+re))^2

gravity at a height = gravity standard (radius earth/(height + radius earth))^2

I think that is all that is required.

yoyigloria said:
I forgot to say that we are to regard the Earth as perfect sphere.

If you regard it as a perfect sphere, then the distance from the center to any point on the surface is the same as the radius, meaning that the weight would not vary.
 
Thanks to everyone for their replies.
i just found the answer. It has to do with the rotational axis of the Earth and the centripetal acceleration that is caused by a centripetal force. Apparently, it is zero at the poles and most pronounced at the equator causing the apparent weight and measured gravitational acceleration to be 0.35% smaller at the equator than at the pole.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top