Problem using conservation of angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of conservation of angular momentum in a problem involving a ball on a conical surface. The original poster successfully solved the problem but questioned why angular momentum is conserved despite vertical acceleration when changing the radius. Responses clarified that taking moments about the vertex of the cone results in zero moment from vertical forces, thus preserving angular momentum. It was emphasized that the moment created by vertical forces does not affect the angular momentum about the vertex. The original poster expressed satisfaction with the explanation, indicating a clearer understanding of the concept.
john001
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 0.2kg ball and its supporting cord are revolving about the vertical axis on the fixed smooth conical surface with an angular velocity of 4 rad/s. The ball is held in the position b=0.3m by the tension T in the cord. If the distance b is reduced to the constant value of 0.2m by increasing the tension T in the cord, compute the new angular velocity w and the work done on the system by T.

Homework Equations



\sumM=dH/dt

H=r x mv

The Attempt at a Solution



I solved this problem using conservation of angular momentum and it came out correct, but I can't for the life of me understand why momentum is conserved. I understand that the force in the radial direction does not have a moment about the radial direction because the cross product is zero, but what about the vertical direction? Doesn't the ball have to accelerate in the vertical direction in order to change its b value from 0.3 to 0.2? And doesn't an acceleration in the vertical direction mean an unbalanced force in the vertical direction, which subsequently means having an unbalanced moment about the middle of the cone?

Please let me know if I'm not making sense.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.JPG
    untitled.JPG
    23.9 KB · Views: 1,301
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

john001 said:
I solved this problem using conservation of angular momentum and it came out correct, but I can't for the life of me understand why momentum is conserved.
I understand that the force in the radial direction does not have a moment about the radial direction because the cross product is zero, but what about the vertical direction? Doesn't the ball have to accelerate in the vertical direction in order to change its b value from 0.3 to 0.2? And doesn't an acceleration in the vertical direction mean an unbalanced force in the vertical direction, which subsequently means having an unbalanced moment about the middle of the cone?

Hi john001! Welcome to PF! :smile:

If you take moments about the vertex of the cone, then the "vertical" force goes through the vertex, and so its moment is zero, and the angular momentum about the vertex will not change.

You are worrying abut "an unbalanced moment about the middle of the cone" … so you are taking moments about a point other than the vertex. Even so, this is to be expected … the moment (a vector) will be horizontal, so it should produce a rotation about the (instantaneously) parallel horizontal axis through the centre of the cone … which is exactly what does happen, since when it goes up the cone it is rotating about a horizontal axis! :biggrin:
 


tiny-tim said:
Hi john001! Welcome to PF! :smile:

If you take moments about the vertex of the cone, then the "vertical" force goes through the vertex, and so its moment is zero, and the angular momentum about the vertex will not change.

You are worrying abut "an unbalanced moment about the middle of the cone" … so you are taking moments about a point other than the vertex. Even so, this is to be expected … the moment (a vector) will be horizontal, so it should produce a rotation about the (instantaneously) parallel horizontal axis through the centre of the cone … which is exactly what does happen, since when it goes up the cone it is rotating about a horizontal axis! :biggrin:

Thank you very much tiny-tim.

It makes sense now.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top