• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Problem with rotational torque and angular acceleration

  • Thread starter Loopas
  • Start date
55
0
I've attached a screenshot of this particular question. I was able to figure out part A but I'm having some difficulty with part B.

Relevant equations:

T = I*alpha
I = .5mr^2 (for a solid cylinder like the grinding wheel)
F = ma

Attempt at solution:

I've gotten as far as setting up the equation and solving for Tf.

(T1-T2)(r) - Tf = (.5)(m)(r)(a)

So Tf = (T1-T2)(r) - (.5)(m)(r)(a)

Which gives me .01878 Nm, which rounds to .019 Nm.

For the acceleration, I've been using .28/6.7 = .04179 m/s^2
 

Attachments

TSny

Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,046
2,619
Consider a free body diagram for each of the hanging masses to get the tensions T1 and T2.
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,689
4,680
How are you calculating the tensions in part B? They will not be the same as in part A, because the acceleration is different. Pls post all your working for part B.
 
55
0
Ok, I think my problem was caused by using the wrong acceleration to calculate the tensions. I get that the system should have the same acceleration, so using a = .28/6.7 universally:

(T1-T2)(r) - Tf = (.5)(m)(r)(a)
(1.2g-6.5a)(r) - Tf = (.5)(m)(r)(a)
(11.76 - .27)(.049) - Tf = (.5)(.8)(.049)(.042)
.56 - Tf = .00082
Tf = .56 Nm
 

TSny

Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,046
2,619
You might want to check if you plugged in the correct sign for your acceleration.
 
55
0
Since the the acceleration is negative, that should mean that Tf is negative as well?
 

TSny

Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,046
2,619
I think you already took into account the negative direction of the friction torque when you wrote a minus sign in front of the friction torque in your first equation in post #4.
 
55
0
How do you know that the acceleration should have a negative sign convention?
 

TSny

Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,046
2,619
The choice of positive direction is up to you and should be made explicit at the very beginning of setting up the equations. I had to guess what direction you are taking as positive by examining your equations. From the left hand side of the first equation in post #4 it appears to me that you are taking positive direction to be the way the heavier mass tries to accelerate the system. But you are given that when you give the system an initial velocity in this positive direction, it slows down rather than speeds up.
 
55
0
So it's pretty much keeping the sign convention consistent. Thanks!
 

TSny

Homework Helper
Gold Member
12,046
2,619
Yes. Good work.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Problem with rotational torque and angular acceleration" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Problem with rotational torque and angular acceleration

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
765
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
12K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top