Problem with variable capacitor and changing angles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the capacitance of a variable capacitor with seven half-circular armatures, each with a radius of 2 cm and a 1 mm separation. The user is unsure how to determine the effective area when considering the arrangement of the armatures and how the changing angles (0, 45, and 135 degrees) affect the capacitance. They reference standard capacitance equations but struggle with how to apply them to a configuration with multiple armatures. Clarification is sought on whether to use the area of a single armature or a combined area for calculations. Understanding the impact of the angle on the effective area is also a key concern.
lesdavies123
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here is the problem: A variable capacitor has seven armatures in the shape of half-circles with a radius of 2 cm. The armatures have a distance of 1 mm separating them. Find the capacity when the angle θ is: (a) 0 degrees; (b) 45 degrees; (c) 135 degrees.

Homework Equations



I guess relevant equations are C=Q/V and C=ε0 * A / d with d being the distance between the armatures. Also ε0 is the constant of permitivitty of empty space which is 8.85 x 10-12 F/m.


The Attempt at a Solution



Basically, I've done problems with capacitors with two armatures, but now there are 7, so I don't know how they are paired up. Usually, the area obtained is the area of one of the two armatures, so here would the area be that of only one armature or should we multiply it by 3.5 to have half the total area (I tried that, but it didn't work). Also, I don't know how the angle changing would be reflected in any equations or what effect it would have. A little help to get me started would make me very happy. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 7 rotating and 8 stationary semicircular plates. The effective area is the part covering both the stationary and rotating plates.

All rotating plates connect to each other. All stationary plates connect to each other.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top