Problems with the Riemann tensor in general relativity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the second order derivative in the context of the Riemann tensor in general relativity, specifically referencing equations (1), (2), (3), and (3.71). The user is seeking clarification on the correctness of equation (3) and its relationship to the second order derivative. There is uncertainty about how to proceed from the current understanding of equation (4) if equation (3) is indeed accurate. Additionally, the user notes that the explanation following equation (3.71) was unclear, which complicates their ability to derive the necessary results. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise derivations and clarity in mathematical expressions related to the Riemann tensor.
Ineedhelpimbadatphys
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
In the picture.
Relevant Equations
Also in pictures.
IMG_2750.jpeg
IMG_2752.jpeg

After Taylor expansion and using equations (2), I have no problem getting to equation (1). Now obviously I have to somehow use (3.71) ,which I do know how, to derive to express the second order derivative.
On the internet I found equation (3), and I have tried to understand where this comes from (4).
Is equation (3) correct, if yes, how am i supposed to contineu from what I have in (4). It should equal 3 times the secobd order derivative?

If equation (3) is not correct, any tips how to continue from what I have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sentence after (3.71) was a little unclear. I meant that I do know how to derive (3.71) using equations (2).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top