Problems with the Riemann tensor in general relativity

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on deriving the second order derivative in the context of the Riemann tensor in general relativity, specifically referencing equations (1), (2), (3), and (3.71). The user is seeking clarification on the correctness of equation (3) and its relationship to the second order derivative. There is uncertainty about how to proceed from the current understanding of equation (4) if equation (3) is indeed accurate. Additionally, the user notes that the explanation following equation (3.71) was unclear, which complicates their ability to derive the necessary results. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise derivations and clarity in mathematical expressions related to the Riemann tensor.
Ineedhelpimbadatphys
Messages
9
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
In the picture.
Relevant Equations
Also in pictures.
IMG_2750.jpeg
IMG_2752.jpeg

After Taylor expansion and using equations (2), I have no problem getting to equation (1). Now obviously I have to somehow use (3.71) ,which I do know how, to derive to express the second order derivative.
On the internet I found equation (3), and I have tried to understand where this comes from (4).
Is equation (3) correct, if yes, how am i supposed to contineu from what I have in (4). It should equal 3 times the secobd order derivative?

If equation (3) is not correct, any tips how to continue from what I have?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The sentence after (3.71) was a little unclear. I meant that I do know how to derive (3.71) using equations (2).
 
I want to find the solution to the integral ##\theta = \int_0^{\theta}\frac{du}{\sqrt{(c-u^2 +2u^3)}}## I can see that ##\frac{d^2u}{d\theta^2} = A +Bu+Cu^2## is a Weierstrass elliptic function, which can be generated from ##\Large(\normalsize\frac{du}{d\theta}\Large)\normalsize^2 = c-u^2 +2u^3## (A = 0, B=-1, C=3) So does this make my integral an elliptic integral? I haven't been able to find a table of integrals anywhere which contains an integral of this form so I'm a bit stuck. TerryW

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K