Product of gaussian random variable with itself

architect
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am interested in the product of a Gaussian random variable with itself. If X is Gaussian then what is X^2? We know that the resultant variable of the product of two independent Guassian variables is still Gaussian but I am afraid that this is not true when you multiply it with itself. Is it a chi-square? Any clarifications will be appreciated.

BW,

Alex
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
architect said:
Hi,

I am interested in the product of a Gaussian random variable with itself. If X is Gaussian then what is X^2? We know that the resultant variable of the product of two independent Guassian variables is still Gaussian but I am afraid that this is not true when you multiply it with itself. Is it a chi-square? Any clarifications will be appreciated.

BW,

Alex

Partial answer to get you thinking more: If, as a specific case, X is standard Gaussian, notice that Y = X^2 will take on only non-negative values so certainly could not be standard Guassian. If I were you I'd investigate the origins of chi-square distributions (both central and non-central chi-square).
 
If p(x) is the probability density function of x, then conservation of probability tells us that

p(x) dx = q(y) dy

where y is any known function of x. Solve the equation for q(y) to get the probability density function for y.
 
thanks for your replies. I will give it a try!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top