Product of two systems of linear differential equations

Leo321
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I have two systems of linear differential equations: \frac{dx}{dt}=Ax, \frac{dy}{dt}=By
x,y are vectors of length n and A,B are nxn matrices.
I have a third system defined by: \frac{dz}{dt}=-ABz
Is there anything we can say about what the third system represents in terms of the first two?
If we know some things about the behavior of x and y, what could be useful ways of deducing something about z?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can z be expressed as a function of x,y?
Or is there some function so that z(t)<f(x(t),y(t))?
We can assume that x(t)>0,y(t)>0.
 
Ok, I think I solved what I wanted through a different path. Thanks for the attempts, even if they were only at the mental level.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
Back
Top