Prof said one thing, book says another. R/L source-free circuit, pic included

  • Thread starter Thread starter mr_coffee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a discrepancy between a professor's explanation and a solution manual regarding the calculation of currents in a source-free R/L circuit. The professor suggested that at 5 microseconds, the current Isw could be considered negligible, equating it to -IL. However, participants argue that this assumption is flawed since the time is not significantly larger than the time constant, indicating that current may still be present. They emphasize that the circuit can be analyzed by treating the loops separately and combining the currents, which contradicts the professor's claim. The conversation highlights the importance of careful analysis in circuit calculations, especially regarding time constants and current behavior.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Prof said one thing, book says another. R/L source-free circuit, pic included :)

Hello everyone. This time after reviewing my professors work, and comparing it to the books solution manual i bought, they don't seem to match. The way the professor explained it to me made me think she was right. She said since it wants u to find Isw @ 5x10^-6 seconds, the current is diminshed enough that u can say its gone. Since IL and Isw are in opposite directions, Isw is just -IL. But the book said f that.
Here is my work and the problems directions:
After being in the configuration shown for hours, the switch in the circuit is closed at t = 0. At t = 5micro seconds, calcualte (a) IL and (b) Isw
http://img236.imageshack.us/img236/9536/lastscan0zc.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
mr_coffee said:
Hello everyone. This time after reviewing my professors work, and comparing it to the books solution manual i bought, they don't seem to match. The way the professor explained it to me made me think she was right. She said since it wants u to find Isw @ 5x10^-6 seconds, the current is diminshed enough that u can say its gone.
The current where? This does not make sense to me because the time is not much larger than the time constant! So no approximation of that sort can be made
Since IL and Isw are in opposite directions, Isw is just -IL. But the book said f that.
Here is my work and the problems directions:
After being in the configuration shown for hours, the switch in the circuit is closed at t = 0. At t = 5micro seconds, calcualte (a) IL and (b) Isw

In a circuit like this, where the middle branch had no resistance (when the switch is closed), you can treat the two loops (left and right) separately and combine the two currents in the middle branch, where the switch is (that's a special case!). So the effect of the left loop (with the 9 volts and the 1 kilo-ohms) is to produced a current downward of 9/1000 = 9 mA downward. Then you can calculate separately the current produced by the right branch (with the inductor and the other 1 kilo-ohm. Upon combining the two currents in the middle branch, you find the current in the switch.
 
That does make sense, I think her assumption was wrong because like you said, the time isn't very long at all, so there could still be current flowing through the inductor. Thanks again for the explanation!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Back
Top