Progress on detection of gravitational waves?

Agerhell
Messages
157
Reaction score
2
Does anyone know how the progress is on the attempts to detect gravitational waves with interferometry?

As far as I know there are only null-results up to this date, but maybe I am misinformed?

The recent supernova in the galaxy Messier 101, should it generate gravitational waves of amplitude/wavelength detectable by current apparature? (It was a supernova of type 1a at a distance of 21 million light-years).

What kind of cosmic event must, according to general relativiy, if they take place not to far away generate gravitational waves that are detectable with the the apparatures of today?

Maybe someone working on LIGO or some other attempt to detect gravitational waves are present on physicsforums and is willing to share his/her thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think any confirmed detection would be headline news.
 
Naty1 said:
I would think any confirmed detection would be headline news.

Yes, but still... A confirmation that some cosmic event that should generate detectable waves does not would still be interesting. "Now we now for sure that a cosmic event of type x at distance y does not generate waves within the current detectable wavelength-limits and above the current detectable amplitude treshold..."

If the apparature get sensitive enough and still no detections are made, then I guess one would have to rethink the theory of the nature of the waves... But how far are we from being forced to that today?
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top