Projectile Force Composition Help

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two identical bullets colliding under specific conditions, focusing on the resultant forces and potential outcomes of the collision. Participants explore various scenarios including fragmentation, recoil, and the possibility of the bullets sticking together, considering the material properties of the projectiles.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the bullets would fragment upon impact, with pieces traveling away clustered around the collision plane.
  • Another participant agrees with the fragmentation idea but also notes that if the bullets are strong enough, they might recoil in opposite directions instead of breaking apart.
  • A different perspective considers the possibility of the bullets sticking together if they are made of a soft material, although this is deemed unlikely for typical bullets.
  • Some participants emphasize that the outcome depends on the material properties of the bullets, discussing brittle versus elastic behavior and the implications for kinetic energy transfer.
  • There is a suggestion that lead, being a soft metal, could lead to the bullets fusing together, but differences in deformation patterns might still cause some material to scatter.
  • Participants mention the coefficient of restitution as a factor in determining the elasticity or plasticity of the materials involved in the collision.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the outcome of the collision, with no consensus reached on whether the bullets will fragment, recoil, or stick together.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem, particularly regarding the assumptions about material properties and the specific conditions of the collision.

Robokapp
Messages
218
Reaction score
0
Me and my dad got in the follwoing debate: if two identical bullets collide in identical conditions, would they staick together, or be rejected parabolically back.


Facts:

Two projectiles of identical dimensions and characteristics collide in identical angles, velocities and directions. There is no atmospherical friction, they are not past terminal velocity, they have no angle (they hit each other at an angle of zero...so they're shot oblically) and they collide fully head-on.

How do the resultant forces resolve?

We understand that there will be one resultant force for object 1 equal to the resultant force ofr object two. Both will be reactions to the orriginal inertia...but will the two forces combine to form one universal resultant with a magnitude of zero or will they each affect their object, bouncing it back?

:D Plz help.

~Robokapp

p.s. not necessarily important, so no life threatening. :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say "C"; none of the above. With the volocities and the materials you're dealing with in most bullets, they'd fragment on impact and fly apart. Most of the pieces would travel away from the impact tightly clustered around the plane that passes through the point where they collide, and is orthagonal to the line along which they were travelling.
 
*poof* there was no spoon
 
Last edited:
Ouch! Evrika...they break into pieces. Thank you...that seems like a reasonable explanation...:D

We both (me and my dad) accept it which is rare.
 
Two projectiles of identical dimensions and characteristics collide in identical angles, velocities and directions. There is no atmospherical friction, they are not past terminal velocity, they have no angle (they hit each other at an angle of zero...so they're shot oblically) and they collide fully head-on.

How do the resultant forces resolve?

We understand that there will be one resultant force for object 1 equal to the resultant force ofr object two. Both will be reactions to the orriginal inertia...but will the two forces combine to form one universal resultant with a magnitude of zero or will they each affect their object, bouncing it back?

:D Plz help.

~Robokapp

p.s. not necessarily important, so no life threatening. :D

The answer can be quite complicated, since it depends largely on the material properties of the projectiles. They could fragment as lurch describes. However if they are strong enough to avoid breaking up, they would recoil in opposite directions from the point of impact. Another (unlikely) possibility is that they would stick together - but this would require a soft material, unusual for bullets.
 
It all comes down to the properties of the material the bullets are made from.

At such high speed, they have significant energy.

A) If it behaves in a "brittle" fashion, LURCH would be correct.

B) If it has elastic properties (which many metals do), they might translate (some) of their kinetic energy into PE(elastic), as mathman suggested.

C) If "soft", they may meld together, as mathman also considered.

Given the "freakish" condition of meeting exactly head on, and that lead is a soft metal, I honestly consider that (C) is a very real possibility, but given the likelihood of minute differences between the bullets causing non-indentical deformation patterns, it is likely that at least some material will scatter, somewhat along the lines of (A).

Does lead have ANY elasticity? I don't know, but even if it did, the results of (C) would probably mean the bullets became more or less fused into one contiguous mass (except for the bits that scattered), so any effect of (B) would simply be in this "mess" expanding slightly once KE was completely exhausted; they would not likely bounce apart, then.
 
mathman said:
The answer can be quite complicated, since it depends largely on the material properties of the projectiles. They could fragment as lurch describes. However if they are strong enough to avoid breaking up, they would recoil in opposite directions from the point of impact. Another (unlikely) possibility is that they would stick together - but this would require a soft material, unusual for bullets.
Exactly. You must consider the coefficient of restitution (i.e. measure of elasticity/plasticity of a material)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K