ficku1 said:
Thank you very much for your answer.
Yes, φ is the initial angle. Oh, it is actually hidden in vx+vy, sorry.
I am aware that there isn't any formula for the solution, but I don't know how to continue. If I understand correctly, I have to express the range so that then I can calculate dx/dφ=0 (x is range, we want x( y=0)) and get maximum angle like it is in the case with no air resistance. Is there even possible to get x and y out of the equations above? Which numerical method would you sugest?
Thank you for your help.
If you have a numerical value for ##K## and a given initial speed ##v_0##, wind speed ##w## and initial angle ##\varphi_0##, then you obtain a pair of coupled nonlinear differential equations to determine ##v_x(t)## and ##v_y(t)## for ##t > 0## with known initial conditions. You can then perform numerical integrations to get ##x(t)## and ##y(t)##. Alternatively, you can write nonlinear coupled second-order DEs for ##d^2x/dt^2## and ##d^2 y/dt^2## in terms of ##dx/dt## and ##dy/dt##, then solve those numerically for given ##x(0), y(0), dx/dt|_{t=0}## and ##dy/dt|_{t=0}##. There are numerous free differential equation solving packages available on-line, and I believe that Matlab also has such packages. I know that Maple and Mathematica have several such facilities.
Anyway, for given initial conditions you get a pair of differential equations that are valid only up to the point ##t = t_0 > 0## where ##y(t)## hits zero; for ##t > t_0## the solution of the differential equations no longer represent physical reality, since they would have the projectile burrowing down through the earth.
So, you can estimate the range ##x(t_0)## for any given initial conditions, but getting truly accurate results may need quite a bit of work. Of course, the range estimates are only as good as the accuracy of the numerical DE solutions, so you need to use robust and well-studied numerical DE packages. Don't try to write one for yourself; the ones in current use have been developed by teams of researchers over decades of work.
I am not an expert in this area, so I am not 100% sure that symbolic solutions are non-existent---I am only about 99.9% sure. (I have, however, carried out some numerical analyses of the type of situation you describe, and I know it is practical and not too time-consuming if using Maple, as I have done.)
Further research on your part may turn up something useful, such as special functions and the like related to your problem.