Projectile motion - bullet shot from a rifle

AI Thread Summary
When a rifle is fired horizontally, both the bullet shot downrange and the bullet dropped from rest hit the ground simultaneously, as they both experience the same gravitational acceleration. The initial horizontal velocity of the fired bullet does not affect its vertical motion, which is solely influenced by gravity. This illustrates the independence of vertical and horizontal motion in projectile motion. If the rifle were angled upwards or downwards, it would alter the time it takes for the bullet to reach the ground. Understanding this concept can be counter-intuitive, but it highlights key principles of physics.
pst535
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At the instant a horizontally held rifle is fired over a level range, a bullet held at the side of the rifle is released and drops to the ground. Which bullet, the one fired downrange or the one dropped from rest, strikes the ground first?

Homework Equations


None

The Attempt at a Solution


My answer: The one dropped from rest strikes the ground first. If we're ignoring air drag, then the bullet will keep moving - at a constant velocity (forever); the bullet that is dropped will accelerate toward the ground, acting under the influence of gravity; thus the dropped bullet will hit the ground first.
This answer, obviously, is wrong.
Right answer: both bullets fall the same vertical distance with the same acceleration g due to gravity and therefore strike the ground at the same time.
But I don't understand why this is the case, even after reading that. Can someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pst535 said:
If we're ignoring air drag, then the bullet will keep moving - at a constant velocity (forever).

Aren't moving objects also attracted to the Earth? If the Earth is applying a force on the bullet, then why would it move at a constant velocity forever?

Are you implying that air drag is what causes bullets to fall?
Or are you implying that bullets don't fall? (until they hit something)edit:
This problem demonstrates the independence of vertical and horiztonal motion (or any perpendicular directions, for that matter)

I've asked a few people this question, and the consensus is that it's counter-intuitive. If I remember correctly, I too got it wrong when I first heard it.
 
Last edited:
I don't really know what I was implying. I think I just don't get it. And also, doesn't the bullet shot out of the rifle have a higher initial velocity, or something? Wouldn't that increase the time it takes for the bullet out of the rifle to hit the ground?
 
pst535 said:
I don't really know what I was implying. I think I just don't get it. And also, doesn't the bullet shot out of the rifle have a higher initial velocity, or something? Wouldn't that increase the time it takes for the bullet out of the rifle to hit the ground?

It has a higher initial velocity, but the initial velocity is 100% in the horizontal direction.
(So it has no effect on the vertical displacement)

If the gun were pointed even slightly upwards, it would take longer to hit the ground.

If the gun were pointed even slightly downwards, it would hit the ground first.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top