Projectile motion conceptual question

AI Thread Summary
An object thrown vertically downwards from a horizontally moving airplane will follow a parabolic path due to its initial horizontal velocity. The confusion arises from interpreting the angle of projection; while it is thrown downwards, the horizontal component remains significant. The equations of motion confirm that the object experiences free fall vertically while maintaining its horizontal velocity from the airplane. Ultimately, all objects in projectile motion, regardless of their initial vectors, follow a parabolic trajectory. Understanding the initial horizontal velocity is crucial to resolving the apparent contradiction in the motion.
madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


if an object is thrown vertically downwards from an airplane moving horizontally with constant velocity would the object fall in a straight line or in a parabolic path



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know it is supposed to fall in a parabolic path because of Newtons first law and it should have the horizontal velocity of the airplane but when I do it with projectile equations
when measured from the horizon theta = 90

vx1=vcos90 = v*0=0
vy1=vcos0 =v
ax1=0
ay1=g
so there is no acceleration or velocity in x so it is supposed to be free fall
so why does the formula for the projectile motion contradict what happens truly?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
madah12 said:
when measured from the horizon theta = 90
The initial velocity is horizontal, so the angle would be 0 not 90.
 
oh I see then vx1=vcos0=v
and vy1=vcos90=0
it makes sense now
thanks
 
Doc Al said:
The initial velocity is horizontal, so the angle would be 0 not 90.

Is it? The problem statement said it was "thrown vertically downwards," so the angle would be negative.

Regardless, all objects fall in parabolas (simiplified flat-Earth solution from the elliptical), regardless of initial vectors/velocities.
 
mugaliens said:
Is it? The problem statement said it was "thrown vertically downwards," so the angle would be negative.
Good point! I misread that as 'dropped vertically downwards' with respect to the plane. :redface:

Nonetheless, the key point is that there is an initial horizontal velocity component due to the motion of the plane.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top