Projectile Motion - Horizontal Component

AI Thread Summary
A rock is thrown from a 100m cliff at a 20-degree angle with an initial velocity of 15 m/s, leading to a discussion on its horizontal distance from the cliff base. The calculated total time of flight is around 4.3 to 5 seconds, with the horizontal component of velocity determined to be approximately 14.095 m/s. The horizontal distance traveled, based on this velocity and time, appears to be around 14.74m, but the expected answer is 70m. Clarifications arise regarding the definition of the "parabolic section" of the trajectory, with some calculations yielding distances around 76.43m when accounting for gravitational acceleration. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding projectile motion dynamics and the effects of gravity on the overall trajectory.
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
A rock is thrown off a 100.0m cliff upward at an angle of 20o to the horizontal. It has an initial velocity of 15ms-1 and strikes the rocks below.

Find how far away the rock is from the base of the cliff.

I calculated total time of flight (projectile parabola + 100m vertical descent) which equalled around 4.3-5.0 (verified by textbook.)

The total time of flight for the parabolic section was about 1.046s

Horizontal component = 15cos20 = 14.095ms-1


SH = ut = 14.095 x 1.046 = 14.74m.

However, the answer is 70m and you can only acquire that by 14.095 x 5 which doesn't make sense because I thought after being projected at an angle it would make a completely vertical descent thus having no effect whatsoever on the horizontal component.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Procrastinate said:
The total time of flight for the parabolic section was about 1.046s
Exactly what do you mean by "parabolic section"? Is the entire trajectory of the rock a parabola or only a piece of it?
 
I got t equals 4.022 taking g as 9.81. from that s=ut+1/2at^2... where u = 15cos(20) and a = 9.81... comes out to 76.43m. ignoring drag.
 
sorry didnt see the answer you provided the book is right but i assume that you take gravity as 10m/s^2
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top