Projectile motion, need to find angle

AI Thread Summary
A cannon with a muzzle speed of 1009 m/s needs to be fired at an angle to hit a target 1900 m away and 795 m above. The initial attempt involved using a projectile motion equation but became complicated due to the angle being inside trigonometric functions. The user then separated the problem into x and y components, deriving equations for both. By expressing the cosine and sine of the angle in terms of time, they aimed to simplify the problem further. Ultimately, the user resolved the issue with assistance, indicating progress in solving for the firing angle.
frosti
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cannon with a muzzle speed of 1009 m/s is used to start an avalanche on a mountain slope. The target is 1900 m from the cannon horizontally and 795 m above the cannon. At what angle, above the horizontal, should the cannon be fired? (Ignore air resistance.)



Homework Equations


I'm thinking this equation is my best bet, yf = tan(angle)xf - (g/(2 * vi^2 * cos^2(angle))) * (xf^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


since I know the vi, xf, and yf, I was able to plug everything in and reached 795 = 1900tan(angle) - 17.375/cos^2(angle). This is where I am stuck. I tried several times but could not find a way to solve for angle.

I would really appreciate it if someone could point out how to solve for the angle in my problem. Or is there a totally different way of solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work DOES look great (I checked your first equation). The problem is that you've got an algebraically difficult thing to solve for (the angle) because it's inside trig functions.

What I suggest is keeping your equation in terms of the components. Relate one of these components ONLY to the initial speed and the remaining component. Then solve for the component you kept. You can use this solution to find the angle.

Added at a later edit: You could also just graph your second function and look for where it crosses zero, but that's easy only because of modern graphing tools.
 
Last edited:
thank you for your input, i separated my problem into x and y components:
x component ---> 1900 = 1009cos(theta) * t
y component ---> 795 = 1009sin(theta) * t - 4.9t^2

I used my x component to solve for cosine
1900/1009 = cos(theta) * t
cos(theta) = 1.883/t

I then used trig identity sin^2(theta) + cos^2(theta) = 1
sin^2(theta) + (1.883/t)^2 = 1
sin(theta) = square root(1 - (1.883/t)^2)

then I plugged sin(theta) equation into my y component
795 = 1009 * square root(1-(1.883/t)^2) * t -4.9t^2

I think I'm on the right track but I don't really know where to go with this, it's not really a quadratic equation and I don't know what to do now. Any pointer would be greatly appreciated.
 
nm, I got it. Thank you for all your help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top