Projectile motion, need to find angle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster presents a problem involving projectile motion, specifically calculating the angle at which a cannon should be fired to hit a target located at a certain horizontal distance and vertical height. The scenario includes a cannon with a known muzzle speed and target coordinates, while air resistance is ignored.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss separating the problem into x and y components of motion. The original poster attempts to manipulate equations involving trigonometric functions to isolate the angle. Others suggest keeping the equation in terms of components and using algebraic relationships to find the angle.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to solve for the angle, with some participants providing guidance on how to approach the problem through component analysis. The original poster expresses uncertainty about the next steps after making progress with their equations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the algebraic difficulty in solving for the angle due to its presence in trigonometric functions. The original poster also notes that they are unsure if they are on the right track, indicating a lack of clarity in their current approach.

frosti
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cannon with a muzzle speed of 1009 m/s is used to start an avalanche on a mountain slope. The target is 1900 m from the cannon horizontally and 795 m above the cannon. At what angle, above the horizontal, should the cannon be fired? (Ignore air resistance.)



Homework Equations


I'm thinking this equation is my best bet, yf = tan(angle)xf - (g/(2 * vi^2 * cos^2(angle))) * (xf^2)


The Attempt at a Solution


since I know the vi, xf, and yf, I was able to plug everything in and reached 795 = 1900tan(angle) - 17.375/cos^2(angle). This is where I am stuck. I tried several times but could not find a way to solve for angle.

I would really appreciate it if someone could point out how to solve for the angle in my problem. Or is there a totally different way of solving this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your work DOES look great (I checked your first equation). The problem is that you've got an algebraically difficult thing to solve for (the angle) because it's inside trig functions.

What I suggest is keeping your equation in terms of the components. Relate one of these components ONLY to the initial speed and the remaining component. Then solve for the component you kept. You can use this solution to find the angle.

Added at a later edit: You could also just graph your second function and look for where it crosses zero, but that's easy only because of modern graphing tools.
 
Last edited:
thank you for your input, i separated my problem into x and y components:
x component ---> 1900 = 1009cos(theta) * t
y component ---> 795 = 1009sin(theta) * t - 4.9t^2

I used my x component to solve for cosine
1900/1009 = cos(theta) * t
cos(theta) = 1.883/t

I then used trig identity sin^2(theta) + cos^2(theta) = 1
sin^2(theta) + (1.883/t)^2 = 1
sin(theta) = square root(1 - (1.883/t)^2)

then I plugged sin(theta) equation into my y component
795 = 1009 * square root(1-(1.883/t)^2) * t -4.9t^2

I think I'm on the right track but I don't really know where to go with this, it's not really a quadratic equation and I don't know what to do now. Any pointer would be greatly appreciated.
 
nm, I got it. Thank you for all your help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
804
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K