Projectile motion or stokes law

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on modeling the behavior of materials dropped into a horizontal air stream within a pipe. High bulk density materials fall vertically, while low bulk density materials are carried away by the air stream, with intermediate materials being deflected horizontally. The user seeks guidance on whether to apply projectile motion principles or Stokes' law for their calculations. A suggested approach involves modeling particles as spheres in a 2-D scenario, accounting for free fall and drag forces. Additionally, the user notes the need to incorporate drag and terminal velocity for smaller, low-density particles that are affected by the air stream.
bif
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Its a while since I've done any motion calcs so I'm after some guidance.

I am vertically dropping a range of materials (size 8-20 mm) into a horizontal air stream in a pipe (pipe diammeter d , ~0.3m)

The horizontal air velocity in the pipe is 10 m/s

The particle bulk density ranges from 200-2500 kg/m3

The high bulk density material falls pretty vertical through the horizontal air stream and the low bulk density material get caught in the air and never lands (ie its carried off in the air stream). In between these 2 extremes, the material is deflected a certain distance along the pipe, with the lighter material moving furthest from the drop position in the horizontal plane.

I am trying to model this.
My known variables/constants are particle size, particle density, pipe diameter (ie vertical drop height), pipe velocity, air viscosity and gravity.

My unknowns are time it takes to hit the bottom of the pipe and how far in the horizontal direction has it moved, when the particle lands

Any advice on how I model this fall. Is it projectile motion, or should I be looking to utilise Stokes law, or both??

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
(I'm new to the forum and think I may have posted this in the wrong area - have just copied and posted here so hope this is correct)

Its a while since I've done any motion calcs so I'm after some guidance.

I am vertically dropping a range of materials (size 8-20 mm) into a horizontal air stream in a pipe (pipe diammeter d , ~0.3m)

The horizontal air velocity in the pipe is 10 m/s

The particle bulk density ranges from 200-2500 kg/m3



The high bulk density material falls pretty vertical through the horizontal air stream and the low bulk density material get caught in the air and never lands (ie its carried off in the air stream). In between these 2 extremes, the material is deflected a certain distance along the pipe, with the lighter material moving furthest from the drop position in the horizontal plane.

I am trying to model this.
My known variables/constants are particle size, particle density, pipe diameter (ie vertical drop height), pipe velocity, air viscosity and gravity.

My unknowns are time it takes to hit the bottom of the pipe and how far in the horizontal direction has it moved, when the particle lands

Any advice on how I model this fall. Is it projectile motion, or should I be looking to utilise Stokes law, or both??

Thanks
 
Any decent model is going to be entirely too complicated to easily describe here. Here's a simple model, which should provide results to a modest degree of accuracy:

All particles are spherical and of the same size. Model the air stream as constant velocity, constant diameter jet. Make the problem 2-D, with the assumption that all particles fall through the same thickness of the horizontal air stream. The particles undergo free fall the entire time, but while they are in the air stream they are subjected to an additional force F = 6*pi*a*U*nu, where 'a' is the diameter of the particle, 'U' the velocity of the air stream , and 'nu' the kinematic viscosity of air (units of Stokes [St]).

Then it's just simple kinematics.
 
Thanks for that Andy,
have managed to do this, but for small low density particles, this doesn't work. I think I need to introduce drag, and terminal velocity, as I know the material l;ess than 5 mm and density of less than 100 kg/m3 with be carried off in the air stream.

How do i include this in my calcs?
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top