Projectile Motion Problem: Solving for Time and Velocity | Homework Help

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a projectile motion problem involving time and velocity. The initial attempt involves calculating time using the formula t = √(2R/g) and substituting it into the equation R+x = vt to find velocity as v = (R+x)/√(2R/g). For part b, there is uncertainty about the value of x and whether the answer is simply (R+x). Participants suggest using kinematic equations and considering the conditions for the ball's trajectory to avoid hitting an obstacle. Two different methods are proposed for solving the problem, highlighting the importance of understanding the relationship between centripetal acceleration and the variables involved.
david1111
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


j19219Q1n179.png



Homework Equations


R = 1/2 gt^2
R+x = vt




The Attempt at a Solution


For a), I tried to find t first, which is equal to √(2R/g). Then, I put t = √(2R/g) into the equation R+x = vt, and I found out that v = (R+x)/√(2R/g), is that correct?

For b), is the answer (R+x)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint: for the ball to reach the ground without hitting the rock, the condition is that the y-coordinate of ball should be greater than a certain height.

placing the origin at the center of sphere, ##R^2=x^2+y^2##
##(x,y)## are coordinates on the surface of hemisphere

use kinematic equation to determine the height of ball at each instant and replace ##t## from the equation.

taking ##x## as common coordinate, relate:

height ≥ ##y##

this is sufficient to solve the question. Try it.
P.S. My ##x## is different than the one asked!
 
hi david1111! :smile:
david1111 said:
For a), I tried to find t first, which is equal to √(2R/g). Then, I put t = √(2R/g) into the equation R+x = vt, and I found out that v = (R+x)/√(2R/g), is that correct?

For b), is the answer (R+x)?

yes, that's all correct, but you don't know what x is!

hint: what is the value of the centripetal acceleration? :wink:
 
Centripetal acceleration= v^2 / R? But, how to relate it and x?
 
what is the value of it?

(you can find the value without knowing the speed)
 
Hi david1111,

NihalSh and tiny-tim have offered two quite different methods. T-T's is easier but requires the assumption that if it is going to hit the rock again it will do so immediately. That can be justified by thinking about how the curvature changes in a parabola, but NihalSh's method avoids this. It would be quite instructive to do both.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top