Projectile Motion: Speed Difference between Horizontal and Vertical Throws

  • Thread starter Thread starter J.live
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speed difference between two baseballs thrown from a height of 7.32 meters: one thrown horizontally and the other straight down, both with an initial speed of 58.7 mph (26.241 m/s). The key point is that while Ball 1 maintains its horizontal speed, its vertical speed increases due to gravity, while Ball 2's speed combines its initial downward speed with the speed gained from falling. The final velocities for both balls are calculated using kinematic equations, with Ball 1's overall speed derived from the Pythagorean theorem and Ball 2's speed being a simple addition of its initial and final vertical velocities. The correct speed difference, as determined through these calculations, is -9.37 m/s, indicating that Ball 2 is faster upon impact. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding kinematic principles and energy conservation in solving projectile motion problems.
J.live
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two baseballs are thrown off the top of a building that is 7.32 m high. Both are thrown with initial speed of 58.7 mph. Ball 1 is thrown horizontally, and ball 2 is thrown straight down. What is the difference in the speeds of the two balls when they touch the ground? (Neglect air resistance.)

vball 1 - vball 2 = ?

Homework Equations



Ei = Ef

The Attempt at a Solution

58.7 mph -> 26.08 m/s ? (not sure)

I used

Ei= Ef

Ball 1 ( x - direction)

Ki (0) + Ui (mgh)= 1/2mv^2+ Uf(0)

gh= 1/2 V^2

V= 11.97m/s ( same velocity for Ball 2 (y-direction))

I just don't know how to find the difference. If someone can explain it in steps. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bump :/
 
58.7 mph = 26.241m/s
This is not an energy problem per se, more of a kinematic one.


Since air resistance is negligible, you can assume that the horizontal velocity of the ball thrown horizontal to be constant,

Does that help now?
 
so the velocity for horizontal is going to stay 26.241 m/s, right?

Then I just simply subtract the two velocities?
 
Yep. Since the question is asking for the difference in speed, as Ball 1 falls to the ground it gains vertical velocity as well (how else would it fall?), and Ball 2 will fall to the ground, gaining vertical velocity.
 
Well I subtracted 11.97 (ball1) - 26.241 (ball2) = -14.271. It came out to be wrong

The answer is -9.37 m/s :/
 
No no, that's not quite how you do it.

Let's keep the horizontal velocity of both balls out of the picture for now.

The vertical velocity of Ball 1 will increase from 0 to X as it falls to the ground,

whilst the vertical velocity of Ball 2 will increase from 26.24(thrown to the floor) to (26.24 + Y) as it falls to the ground. Calculating it is simply, v^2 = u^2 + 2AD where A is acceleration due to free fall and D is the height of the building.

After which, we look at horizontal velocity.

Since the horiz velocity of ball 2 is 0, and will likely stay that way.

The horiz of Ball 1 is constant, which is 26.241.

Hence, just using Pythagoras' on Ball 1, you can find the speed for Ball 1.

The speed of Ball 2 would be the vertical velocity only.
 
what the? We have to find the vertical speed of ball 1? Why do we have to do that?
so using Pythagorean

(7.3)^2 + (26.241)^2 = c^2 ?

I am not getting this.
 
Last edited:
Your vertical velocity (7.3) for Ball 1 is wrong.
 
  • #10
No, I am not to able to understand what we are looking for here? Why do we need to find the vertical velocity for ball 1 in the first place? If so how do we do it? using Pythagorean ?
 
  • #11
To find the vertical velocity for Ball 1, you engage the same method as Ball 2, where v^2 = u^2 + 2AD,

Since initial vertical velocity of Ball 1 = 0, hence V^2 = 2AD, V = 11.98m/s

The final velocity of Ball 1 would be C^2 = 11.98^2 + 26.241^2
 
  • #12
oh, so that's how we find the overall velocity for Ball 1 , right?

Then for Ball 2? We have to find the overall velocity for that too?

How would we do that ?
 
  • #13
Yep, as I mentioned earlier, the velocity for Ball 2 would be the initial velocity + the additional vertical velocity, which is found by V^2 = U^2 + 2AD as well
 
  • #14
I got 11.98 m/s which is the final velocity for ball 2 as well?

I don't understand how can we simply add 26.41 to 11.98 for ball 2? Isn't it two dimensional like Ball 1?
 
  • #15
Yes, it is 2 dimensional, but Ball 2 experiences only vertical velocity, since it is thrown straight down.
 
  • #16
makes sense. So in that case we can add the two velocities without using Pythagorean ?
 
  • #17
If you did the kinematics method (V^2 = U^2 + 2AD), you should get the final velocity which is after addition already.
 
  • #18
For Ball 1 11.98^2 + 26.241^2= c^2 ---> 28.84

For Ball 2 using the same method V^2 = U^2 + 2AD
V^2= 26.241^2 + 2 (9.8)(7.32)
V = 28.84 m/s

I still didn't get the right answer.

What am I doing wrong?

Sorry for bothering you time and again.
 
  • #19
What is the answer?
 
  • #20
Answer given is -9.37 m/s
 
  • #21
Have you missed out anything from the question?
 
  • #22
No, I have not missed out since I copy pasted it.

What the professor did was use the Kinetic energy equation

Ball 1
Eiy = Efy

Ki + Vi = Kf + Vf

0+ mgh = 1/2 mvf^2+0

Vfy= 11.98 m/s
================
Ball 2

Eiy= Efy

0+mgh= mvf^2 + 0

Vfy= 11.98 m/s
============================
Then he used Pythagorean Theorem for Ball 1

11.98^2 + 26.241^2= C^2

But for Ball 2 He simply added Viy(26.241)+ VfY(11.98)

Which does come out to be -9.38 m/s :/
 
Last edited:
  • #23
J.live said:
No, I have not missed out since I copy pasted it.

What the professor did was use the Kinetic energy equation

Ball 1
Eiy = Efy

Ki + Vi = Kf + Vf

0+ mgh = 1/2 mvf^2+0

Vfy= 11.98 m/s
================
Ball 2

Eiy= Efy

0+mgh= mvf^2 + 0

Vfy= 11.98 m/s
============================
Then he used Pythagorean Theorem for Ball 1

11.98^2 + 26.241^2= C^2

But for Ball 2 He simply added Viy(26.241)+ VfY(11.98)

Which does come out to be -9.38 m/s :/
There is something faulty about this.

The initial KE of Ball 2 should not be 0, but instead 1/2 (m)(26.241)^2.

And after calculation, the final velocity still gives me the same answer I had during kinematics.

Your professor has made the mistake that (Vf + Vi)^2 = Vf^2 + Vi^2
 
  • #24
This is strange. Anyways, thanks for your help.
 
Back
Top