Projectiles 3D. Working with forces like wind

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on researching projectiles, specifically crossbow systems, and the impact of external factors like wind on their performance. The user seeks additional information on how these forces affect arrow orientation, range, and velocity, as the current resources do not cover these aspects. They also request recommendations for free software to simulate projectile behavior. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding environmental influences on projectile dynamics. Overall, the user is looking to enhance their knowledge and simulation capabilities regarding crossbows and external forces.
eXniTheR
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello! I'm doing a research work about projectiles and i thought of crossbow system. I am currently studying using these articles: http://ciencia.hsw.uol.com.br/framed.htm?parent=crossbow.htm&url=http://www.stortford-archers.org.uk/medieval.htm
and
http://science.howstuffworks.com/crossbow1.htm

So far i have understand how it works, but none of both sites talks about external factors such wind and other forces that may disturb the arrow orientation and though its range and velocity... So, can you please provide any more information about it? Also, if you have a nice free software so i can simulate this kind of projectiles, i would appreciate it very much :)


Thank you! :D
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Please? :(
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top